United States v. Kahriger

United States v. Kahriger
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued December 16–17, 1952 Decided March 9, 1953
Full case name	United States v. Kahriger
Citations	345 U.S. 22 (more) 73 S. Ct. 510; 97 L. Ed. 754; 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2699; 53-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9245; 43 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 93; 1953-1 C.B. 456
Prior history	Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Holding
The federal occupational tax on persons engaged in the business of accepting wagers under the 1951 Revenue Act was constitutional.
Court membership
Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson Associate Justices Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed Felix Frankfurter · William O. Douglas Robert H. Jackson · Harold H. Burton Tom C. Clark · Sherman Minton
Case opinions
Majority	Reed, joined by Vinson, Burton, Clark, Minton
Concurrence	Jackson
Dissent	Black, joined by Douglas
Dissent	Frankfurter, joined by Douglas, in part
Laws applied
U.S. Const. art. I, §8, clause 1; U.S. Const. amend. X; Revenue Act of 1951
Overruled by
Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39 (1968)

United States v. Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22 (1953), was a United States Supreme Court ruling that held certain provisions of the Revenue Act of 1951 were constitutional, in particular sections related to an occupational tax on persons involved in gambling.

The Supreme Court ruled that the Congressional purpose of penalizing intrastate gambling under the guise of imposing a tax did not violate the Constitution by infringing the police power reserved to the states. The Court stated: "Unless there are [penalty] provisions extraneous to any tax need, courts are without authority to limit the exercise of the taxing power."

The Supreme Court also ruled that the 1951 Revenue Act did not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. However, this holding was later overruled by the Court in Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39 (1968).

Further reading

• .
• .

External sources

• Text of the opinion from Findlaw.com