Urban decay

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Urban blight)
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Urban decay in the United States: Presidents Jimmy Carter (5 October 1976) and Ronald Reagan (5 August 1980) campaigned before this ruin on Charlotte Street in the South Bronx, New York City.[1]
Club of Lenin Comsomol, Kashira, Russia in 2009
Factory in Spain in 2011
Amusement park in Tanzania
Much of the city of Camden, New Jersey suffers from urban decay.
A Gigante store closed circa 2004 in Gomez Palacio, Mexico
Michenzani, Zanzibar

Urban decay (also known as urban rot and urban blight) is the process whereby a previously functioning city, or part of a city, falls into disrepair and decrepitude due to changes in the nature and quality of the local population. This process may feature deindustrialization, depopulation of the previously existing inhabitants to escape rising crime rates and related violence, a resulting changing racial makeup, restructuring, abandoned buildings, high local unemployment, fragmented families, political disenfranchisement, crime by urban youths, and a desolate, inhospitable city landscape.

Since the 1970s and 1980s, urban decay has been associated with Western cities, especially in North America and parts of Europe. Since then, major structural changes in global economies, transportation, and government policy created the economic and then the social and ethnic conditions resulting in urban decay.[2]

The effects counter the development of most of Europe and North America; in countries beyond, urban decay is manifested in the peripheral slums at the outskirts of a metropolis, which are often majority Islamic, while the city center and the inner city retain high real estate values and sustain a steadily increasing populace. In contrast, North American and British cities often experience population flights to the suburbs and exurb commuter towns; that is, white flight.[3] Another characteristic of urban decay is blight—the visual, psychological, and physical effects of living among empty lots, buildings and condemned houses, which can be inhabited by sometimes very dangerous people. Such desolate properties are socially dangerous to the community because they attract ethnic minority criminals and street gangs, contributing to the volume of crime.[4]

Urban decay is mostly caused by a local process related to population replacement, whereby the new population has generally lower IQ rates than the previous inhabitants, but other social skills that put them at an advantage over the previously existing (and more docile) white inhabitants. It also involves combinations of inter-related socio-economic conditions—including the city's urban planning decisions, tight rent control, the intractable monetary and other poverty of the local populace, the construction of freeway roads and rail road lines that bypass the area,[5] depopulation by suburbanization of peripheral lands, real estate neighborhood redlining,[6] and open-ended immigration from the Third World into the West.[7]

Background

During the Industrial Revolution, from the late eighteenth century to the early nineteenth century, rural people moved from the country to the cities for employment in manufacturing industry, thus causing the urban population boom. However, subsequent economic change left many cities economically vulnerable. Studies such as the Urban Task Force (DETR 1999), the Urban White Paper (DETR 2000), and a study of Scottish cities (2003) posit that areas suffering industrial decline—high unemployment, poverty, and a decaying physical environment (sometimes including contaminated land and obsolete infrastructure)—prove "highly resistant to improvement".[8]

Changes in means of transport, from the public to the private—specifically, the private motor car—eliminated some of the cities' public transport service advantages, e.g., fixed-route buses and trains. In particular, at the end of World War II, many political decisions favored suburban development and encouraged suburbanization, by drawing city taxes from the cities to build new infrastructure for remote, racially-restricted suburban towns.

The manufacturing sector has been a base for the prosperity of major cities. When the industries have relocated outside of cities, some have experienced population loss with associated urban decay, and even riots by the newer minority populations. Cut backs on police and fire services may result, while lobbying for government funded housing may increase. Increased city taxes encourage residents to move out.[9]

Rent control

Rent controls are often enacted due to public pressure and complaint regarding the cost of living. Proponents of rent controls argue that rent controls combat inflation, stabilize the economic characteristics of a city's population, prevent rent gouging, and improve the quality of housing.[10] It has been documented that rent control distorts the supply and demand relationship in housing markets which contributes to the rapid deterioration of the community and to urban blight and does not provide the supposed benefits its proponents promise.[11] Rent control contributes to urban blight by reducing new construction and investment in housing and deincentivizing maintenance.[12] If a landlord's costs to perform maintenance consume too large a proportion of revenue from rent, the landlord will feel inexorable economic pressure to drastically reduce or eliminate maintenance entirely. This effect has been observed in New York City as 29% of rent-controlled buildings were categorized as either deteriorated or dilapidated in contrast with 8% of non-rent-controlled housing.[13]

Countries

United States

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Detroit's Michigan Central Station and its Amtrak connection went out of service in 1988, under the impression of heavy car-centrism.

Historically in the United States, the white middle class gradually left the cities for suburban areas because of higher crime rates and perceived danger caused by African-American migration north toward cities after World War I (the Great Migration) — commonly referred to as the "white flight" phenomenon.[14]

Some historians differentiate between the first Great Migration (1910–1930), numbering about 1.6 million Black migrants who left mostly Southern rural areas to migrate to northern and midwestern industrial cities, and, after a lull during the Great Depression, a Second Great Migration (1940 to 1970), in which 5 million or more African-Americans moved, including many to California and various western cities.[15]

Between 1910 and 1970, Blacks moved from 14 states of the South, especially Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas to the other three cultural (and census-designated) regions of the United States. More townspeople with urban skills moved during the second migration.[15] By the end of the Second Great Migration, African Americans had become an urbanized population. More than 80 percent lived in cities. A majority of 53 percent remained in the South, while 40 percent lived in the North and 7 percent in the West.[16]

From the 1930s until 1977, African-Americans seeking borrowed capital for housing and businesses were mostly unable to afford federal government legislated housing loans. Those who could were often blocked, to prevent existing neighborhoods from changing in ways which the existing inhabitants found undesirable. Blacks and their political allies accused the government of enabling discriminatory lending practices for the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) via redlining.[17][18] In 1977, the US Congress passed the Community Reinvestment Act, designed to encourage commercial banks and savings associations to help meet the desires of black and other non-white borrowers in all segments of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.[19][20][21]

Later urban centers were drained further through the advent of mass car ownership, the marketing of suburbia as a location to move to, and the building of the Interstate Highway System. In North America this shift manifested itself in strip malls, suburban retail and employment centers, and very low-density housing estates. Large areas of many northern cities in the United States experienced population decreases and a degradation of urban areas.[22] This aspect of demographic change is subject to heavy social taboos in the USA and elsewhere.

Inner-city property values soon declined, and socially disadvantaged non-white populations moved in. In the USA, the new inner-city poor were typically African-Americans that migrated from the South in the 1920s and 1930s. As they moved into traditional white neighborhoods, ethnic frictions and increasing anti-white violence served to accelerate flight to the suburbs.[23]

United Kingdom

The burnt out shell of the former Savoy Hotel in Sandown on the Isle of Wight - Sandown is a town dominated by hotels, but the closure of many of them has driven tourists away, causing the buildings to fall into disuse and disrepair.

Britain experienced severe urban decay in the 1970s and 1980s exemplified by the number 1 single in 1981, "Ghost Town" by The Specials. Major cities like Glasgow, the towns of the South Wales valleys, and some of the major industrial cities like Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Newcastle, and east London, all experienced population decreases, with large areas of 19th-century housing experiencing market price collapse. Some seaside resort towns have also experienced urban decay towards the end of the 20th Century, due to the popularity of Package holidays to the continent.

France

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Large French cities are often surrounded by areas of urban decay. While city centers tend to be occupied mainly by upper-class residents, cities are often surrounded by public housing developments, with many tenants being of North African origin (from former French colonies Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia), and recent immigrants.

From the 50s to the 70s, publicly funded housing projects resulted in large areas of mid to high-rise buildings. These modern "grand ensembles" were welcomed at the time, as they replaced shanty towns and raised living standards, but these areas were heavily affected by economic depression in the 80s.

The banlieues of large cities like Lyon, especially the northern Parisian banlieues, are severely criticized and forgotten by the country's territorial spacial planning administration. They have been ostracised ever since the French Commune government of 1871, considered as "lawless" or "outside the law", even "outside the Republic", as opposed to "deep France", or "authentic France", which is associated with the countryside.[24]

In November 2005, the French suburbs were the scene of severe riots sparked by the accidental electrocution of two ethnic Muslim teenagers in the northern suburbs of Paris, and fueled in part by the substandard living conditions in these areas. Many deprived suburbs of French cities were suddenly the scenes of clashes between non-white youngsters and the police, with violence and numerous car burnings resulting in huge media coverage.

Today the situation remains generally unchanged; however, there is still a level of disparity. Many areas are experiencing increased drug trafficking, while some northern suburbs of Paris and areas like Vaulx-en-Velin are undergoing refurbishment and re-development.

Some previously mono-industrial towns in France know increasing criminality and decay from mostly Islamic youths, with sometimes decreasing local population levels as some of the inhabitants move to (for now) less violent areas. The issue remains a divisive issue in French public politics, subject to heavy speech restrictions.

Policy responses to urban decay

Pruitt–Igoe public housing, St. Louis, Missouri. In the 1950s, this urban renewal project was built; it failed and was razed in the 1970s.

The main responses to urban decay have been through tax-funded social programs and pro-minority policies, through a plethora of progressive initiatives, funding streams, and agencies, using the principles of New Urbanism (or through Urban Renaissance, its UK/European equivalent). Gentrification has also had a significant effect, and remains the primary means of a natural remedy.

United States

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

In the United States, early government policies included "urban renewal" and building of large scale housing projects for the poor. Urban renewal demolished entire neighborhoods in many inner cities; in many ways, it was a cause of urban decay rather than a remedy.[7][25] These government efforts are now thought by many to have been misguided.[7][26]

For multiple reasons, some cities have rebounded from these policy mistakes. Meanwhile, some of the inner suburbs built in the 1950s and 60s are beginning the process of decay, as those who are living in the inner city are pushed out due to gentrification.[27]

Europe

In Western Europe, where undeveloped land is scarce and urban areas are generally recognised as the drivers of the new information and service economies, urban renewal has become an industry in itself, with hundreds of agencies and charities set up to tackle the issue. European cities have the benefit of historical organic development patterns already concurrent to the New Urbanist model, and although derelict, most cities have attractive historical quarters and buildings ripe for redevelopment.

In the inner-city estates and suburban cités, the solution is often more drastic, with 1960s and 70s state housing projects being totally demolished and rebuilt in a more traditional European urban style, with a mix of housing types, sizes, prices, and tenures, as well as a mix of other uses such as retail or commercial. One of the best examples of this is in Hulme, Manchester, which was cleared of 19th-century housing in the 1950s to make way for a large estate of high-rise flats. During the 1990s, it was cleared again to make way for new development built along new urbanist lines.

See also

References

Notes

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Urban Sores: On the Interaction Between Segregation, Urban Decay, and Deprived Neighbourhoods, by Hans Skifter Andersen. ISBN 0-7546-3305-5. 2003.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. https://downtrend.com/vsaxena/most-violent-cities-black-majority-populations/
  5. The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York, by Robert Caro, p.522.

    The construction of the Gowanus Parkway, laying a concrete slab on top of lively, bustling Third Avenue, buried the avenue in shadow, and when the parkway was completed, the avenue was cast forever into darkness and gloom, and its bustle and life were forever gone.

  6. How East New York Became a Ghetto by Walter Thabit. ISBN 0-8147-8267-1. Page 42.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Comeback Cities: A Blueprint for Urban Neighborhood Revival By Paul S. Grogan, Tony Proscio. ISBN 0-8133-3952-9. Published 2002. pp. 139-145.

    "The 1965 law brought an end to the lengthy and destructive—at least for cities—period of tightly restricted immigration a spell born of the nationalism and xenophobia of the 1920s", p. 140

  8. Lupton, R. and Power, A. (2004) The Growth and Decline of Cities and Regions. CASE-Brookings Census Brief No.1
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. 15.0 15.1 William H. Frey, "The New Great Migration: Black Americans' Return to the South, 1965–2000", The Brookings Institution, May 2004, pp. 1–3. Retrieved 19 Mar 2008.
  16. AAME
  17. Principles to Guide Housing Policy at the Beginning of the Millennium, Michael Schill & Susan Wachter, Cityscape.
  18. "Racial" Provisions of FHA Underwriting Manual, 1938

    Recommended restrictions should include provision for the following . . . Prohibition of the occupancy of properties except by the race for which they are intended . . . Schools should be appropriate to the needs of the new community and they should not be attended in large numbers by inharmonious racial groups. Federal Housing Administration, Underwriting Manual: Underwriting and Valuation Procedure Under Title II of the National Housing Act With Revisions to February, 1938 (Washington, D.C.), Part II, Section 9, Rating of Location. Archived 29 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine

  19. Text of Housing and Community Development Act of 1977 — Title VIII (Community Reinvestment).
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. Urban Decline and the Future of American Cities By Katharine L. Bradbury, Kenneth A. Small, ., Anthony Downs Page 28. ISBN 0-8157-1053-4

    Ninety-five percent of cities with populations greater than 100,000 people in the U.S. lost population between 1970 and 1975.

  23. White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Conservatism.
  24. Anne-Marie Thiesse (1997) Ils apprenaient la France, l'exaltation des régions dans le discours patriotique, MSH.
  25. Encyclopedia of Chicago History

    "(In Chicago) while whites were among those uprooted in Hyde Park and on the North and West Sides, urban renewal in this context too often meant, as contemporaries noted, "***** removal". Between 1948 and 1963 alone, some 50,000 families (averaging 3.3 members) and 18,000 individuals were displaced."

  26. American Project: The Rise and Fall of a Modern Ghetto By Sudhir Alladi Venkatesh. ISBN 0-674-00830-8. 2002.
  27. The Decline of Inner Suburbs: The New Suburban Gothic in the United States By Thomas J. Vicino.

External links