User talk:Jack-arcalon

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core! We know you will contribute greatly. Please read the editors' guidelines. Have fun! Crew (talk) 16:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your page on Population replacement looks somewhat unfinished. It might have been better to keep it under your user area until finished. You could have placed it at User:Jack-arcalon/Population replacement for example until it was fully formed. You can still rename it. -- Crew (talk) 18:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Any editing comments or suggestions (style, format, content etc) can be posted as comments on my blog, where many posts discuss ongoing Infogalactic.com issues (with a strong focus on new articles). - - - http://jack-arcalon.livejournal.com/ --Jack-arcalon (talk) 06:18, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Articles moved to userspace for time being

Your articles have been moved here for the time being since they read as opinion/promotional rather than factual or encyclopedic, and will probably have to be reviewed for accuracies.

For the record, IG is not "Kings Wiki", it is meant to be a serious encyclopedia project to rival Wikipedia on the market, rather than just a catalogue of original research and opinions.--Tears of Ovid (talk) 15:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Jack-arcalon/List of alt-right concepts

--Tears of Ovid (talk) 14:55, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Encyc

For the record I created t--Tears of Ovid (talk) 20:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)hat article, and after looking at the website more I don't think it deserves any attention. I won't go into all of the details, but it's more or less dead except for one editor, and nearly every article I've looked at is either complete crap written on a junior high kid's level, or is only 1 sentence long, so it barely qualifies as an encyclopedia, or even a Reddit blog in my opinion.

As far as 'original research' goes, I talked to Vox Day and he doesn't want this to be a self-promotional website, but written in the tone as a professional encyclopedia, so articles promoting self-coined neologisms are probably discouraged, we're looking for factual and sourcable content.--Tears of Ovid (talk) 20:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

You should be able to import pages

I gave you the ability to import pages. It should show up soon. Special:SpecialPages down the bottom. -- Crew (talk) 15:16, 31 October 2017 (UTC)