Vallum (Hadrian's Wall)

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Vallum of Hadrian's Wall, near Milecastle 42 (Cawfields)

The Vallum is a huge earthwork associated with Hadrian's Wall in England. Unique on any Roman frontier, it runs practically from coast to coast to the south of the wall.

The earliest surviving mention of the earthwork is by Bede (Historia, I.12), who refers to a vallum, or earthen rampart, as distinct from the wall, or murus; the term is still used despite the fact that the essential element is a ditch, or fossa. It was for long thought that the Vallum predated the stone wall, the most elaborate phasing being presented in 1801 by William Hutton,[1] who thought, wrongly, that the south vallum mound and the marginal mound, with a ditch between, were the work of Agricola, that the vallum ditch and north mound were added by Hadrian, and that the stone wall was the work of Severus. In fact all these elements date to Hadrian's reign, with the stone wall having been built first.

Layout and course

The Vallum comprises a ditch, nominally Lua error in Module:Convert at line 1851: attempt to index local 'en_value' (a nil value). wide and Lua error in Module:Convert at line 1851: attempt to index local 'en_value' (a nil value). deep, with a flat bottom, flanked by two mounds about 6 metres wide and Lua error in Module:Convert at line 1851: attempt to index local 'en_value' (a nil value). high, set back some Lua error in Module:Convert at line 1851: attempt to index local 'en_value' (a nil value). from the ditch edges. For a great deal of its length a third lower mound, the so-called marginal mound occupies the south berm (flat area between mound and ditch), right on the southern lip of the ditch.[2] The total width of the fortification (consisting, from north to south, of mound, berm, ditch, marginal mound, berm, mound) was thus about Lua error in Module:Convert at line 1851: attempt to index local 'en_value' (a nil value)..

In several places – for example at Heddon-on-the-Wall and Limestone Corner – the Vallum was cut through solid rock, sometimes for lengthy distances.

The distance of the Vallum from the Wall varies. In general there was a preference for the earthwork to run close to the rear of the Wall where topography allowed. In the central sector the Wall runs along the top of the crags of the Whin Sill, while the Vallum, laid out in long straight stretches, lies in the valley below to the south, as much as Lua error in Module:Convert at line 1851: attempt to index local 'en_value' (a nil value). away.

Archaeology and purpose

Before the middle of the 19th century, the Vallum was most commonly known as Agricola's Ditch, since antiquarians wrongly thought that it had been constructed during the period when Agricola was Governor of Britannia, the Roman province spanning what is now England, Wales and southern Scotland. After John Hodgson published the final portion of his History of Northumberland in 1840,[3] it became generally accepted that the Wall and Vallum had been built during the reign of Hadrian. Hodgson based his view on evidence which included a stone tablet in the Museum of Antiquities, Newcastle upon Tyne, which had been found in Milecastle 38 on the Wall in the previous century, its significance having been overlooked. The inscription on the tablet, probably made and erected to mark the completion of the milecastle, includes the names of Hadrian and Aulus Platorius Nepos (Governor of Britannia during Hadrian's reign), as well as "Legio II Augusta" (Second Augustan Legion). It is now accepted that units of that Roman legion built the section of Hadrian's Wall which includes the milecastle, and they would have automatically included the names of the current emperor and governor on the tablet.[4]

The first excavation was undertaken in 1893 at Great Hill (Heddon-on-the-Wall, near Newcastle upon Tyne),[5] where it was observed that the Vallum ditch was cut through a seam of fire-clay which was deployed in both mounds. This excavation demonstrated that the main north and south mounds were contemporary and built using material dug from the ditch. In the late 20th century several excavations established that the marginal mound was also contemporary.[6]

The Vallum is known to have been constructed some time after the wall was completed, as it deviates to the south around several wall-forts which were either completed or under construction when the wall was nearing completion.[7] There would have been a crossing-point like a causeway or bridge to the south of each wall-fort—several such causeways are known, such as the one at Condercum in Benwell, a western suburb of Newcastle. Causeways have also been detected to the south of several milecastles.[8]

It is thought that the easternmost section of Hadrian's Wall between the forts of Pons Aelius (Newcastle upon Tyne) and Segedunum (Wallsend) was an addition to the original plan. The Vallum was not constructed behind this extra length of the wall, indeed it did not apparently even reach the fort at Newcastle; instead it seems it stopped in the western Newcastle suburb of Elswick. This was probably because from here on the Vallum's function as a southern barrier to the wall was performed by the River Tyne.

Although there is no definitive historical evidence as to why the Roman army built this unusual barrier, modern archaeological opinion is that the Vallum established the southern boundary of a military zone bounded on the north by the wall itself.[9] The zone would have been "out-of-bounds" to civilians and those with no valid reason to be there.

Sometime in the 2nd century AD, the Vallum was "slighted"—that is, the ramparts were broken through and the ditch filled in at fairly regular intervals along its length. Archaeologists and historians have speculated that either the Vallum was then deemed unnecessary, or that it was proving to be a hindrance to military and authorised civilian traffic. Some have suggested that this coincided with the building of the Antonine Wall in Scotland and the temporary abandonment of Hadrian's Wall.[2]

It is worth noticing at this point that the Antonine Wall was a less formidable barrier than Hadrian's Wall, for two main reasons: firstly, because it was built out of turf rather than stone; and secondly, because it had no equivalent ditch system like the Vallum behind the Wall. It may have been for these reasons that the Antonine Wall was not garrisoned for very long.

References

  1. William Hutton (1802). The History of the Roman Wall, Which Crosses the Island of Britain. London: J. Nichols and Son.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Heywood, B. (1966). "The Vallum—Its Problems Restated", in M. G. Jarrett and B. Dobson, eds., Britain and Rome: Essays Presented to Eric Birley. Kendal: Wilson, pp. 85–94
  3. John Hodgson (1840). A History of Northumberland. Newcastle: E. Walker.
  4. Roger J. A. Wilson (2002). A Guide to the Roman Remains in Britain. London: Constable & Robinson. p. 467.
  5. Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle upon Tyne (1894). "First Report of the Committee Appointed to make Excavations per Lineam Valli". Archaeologia Aeliana. 2 (16): xxvi–xxvii.
  6. Wilmott, T. (forthcoming). "Four Investigations of the Linear Elements of Hadrian’s Frontier Works, 1980–2000". Hadrian’s Wall: Archaeological Research by English Heritage, 1976–2000, ed. T. Wilmott.
  7. Simpson, F. G.; Richmond, I. A. (1937). "The Fort on Hadrian's Wall at Halton". Archaeologia Aeliana. 4 (14): 151–71.
  8. Welfare, H. (2000). "Causeways, at Milecastles Across the Ditch of Hadrian’s Wall". Archaeologia Aeliana. 5 (28): 13–25.
  9. Bidwell, P. T. (2005). "The System of Obstacles on Hadrian’s Wall: Their Extent, Date and Purpose". Arbeia Journal 8: 53–76.

External links

Media related to Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. at Wikimedia Commons