This is a good article. Click here for more information.

William Howe, 5th Viscount Howe

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
The Right Honourable
The Viscount Howe
Gen. Sir William Howe.jpg
Member of Parliament
for Nottingham
In office
Serving with Willoughby Aston (1758–1761)
Serving with John Plumptre (1761–1774)
Serving with Charles Sedley (1774–1778)
Serving with Abel Smith (1778–1779)
Serving with Robert Smith (1779–1780)
Preceded by George Howe
Succeeded by Daniel Parker Coke
Personal details
Born 10 August 1729 (1729-08-10)
Died 12 July 1814(1814-07-12) (aged 84)
Twickenham, United Kingdom
Resting place Twickenham
Political party Whig
Military service
Allegiance  Great Britain
Service/branch  British Army
Years of service 1746–1803
Rank General
Commands Colonel, 60th (later 58th) Regiment of Foot

Colonel, 46th Regiment of Foot
Commander-in-Chief, North America

Colonel, 19th Light Dragoons
Northern District
Battles/wars War of the Austrian Succession

Seven Years' War

American War of Independence

French Revolutionary Wars

General William Howe, 5th Viscount Howe, KB, PC (10 August 1729 – 12 July 1814) was a British army officer who rose to become Commander-in-Chief of British forces during the American War of Independence. Howe was one of three brothers who enjoyed distinguished military careers.

Having joined the army in 1746, Howe saw extensive service in the War of the Austrian Succession and Seven Years' War. He became known for his role in the capture of Quebec in 1759 when he led a British force to capture the cliffs at Anse-au-Foulon, allowing James Wolfe to land his army and engage the French in the Battle of the Plains of Abraham. Howe also participated in the campaigns to take Louisbourg, Belle Île and Havana.

Howe was sent to North America in March 1775, arriving in May after the Revolutionary War broke out. After leading British troops to a costly victory in the Battle of Bunker Hill, Howe took command of all British forces in America from Thomas Gage in September of that year. Howe's record in North America was marked by the successful capture of both New York City and Philadelphia. However, poor British campaign planning for 1777 contributed to the failure of John Burgoyne's Saratoga campaign, which played a major role in the entry of France into the war. Howe's role in developing those plans and the degree to which he was responsible for British failures that year (despite his personal success at Philadelphia) have both been subjects of contemporary and historic debate.

He resigned his post as Commander in Chief, North America, in 1778, and returned to England, where he was at times active in the defence of the British Isles. He served for many years in Parliament, and was knighted after his successes in 1776. He inherited the Viscountcy of Howe upon the death of his brother Richard in 1799. He married, but had no children, and the viscountcy was extinguished with his death in 1814.

Early life and career

William Howe was born in England, the third and youngest son of Emanuel Howe, 2nd Viscount Howe and Charlotte, the daughter of Sophia von Kielmansegg, Countess of Leinster and Darlington, an acknowledged illegitimate half-sister of King George I.[1][2] His mother was a regular in the courts of George II and George III.[2] This connection with the crown may have improved the careers of all three sons, but all were also very capable officers.[3] His father was a politician, who served as Governor of Barbados where he died in 1735.[1] William's eldest brother, General George Howe, was killed just before the 1758 Battle of Carillon at Fort Ticonderoga. His other brother, Admiral Richard Howe, rose to become one of Britain's leading naval commanders.[4]

He entered the army when he was 17 by buying a cornet's commission in the Duke of Cumberland's Dragoons in 1746. He then served for two years in Flanders during the War of the Austrian Succession. After the war he was transferred to the 20th Regiment of Foot, where he became a friend of James Wolfe.[5]

Seven Years' War

During the Seven Years' War Howe's service first brought him to America, and did much to raise his reputation. He joined the newly formed 58th (Rutlandshire) Regiment of Foot in February 1757, and was promoted to lieutenant colonel in December of that year.[6] He commanded the regiment at the Siege of Louisbourg in 1758, leading an amphibious landing under heavy enemy fire. This action won the attackers a flanking position and earned Howe a commendation from Wolfe.[7]

Howe commanded a light infantry battalion under General Wolfe during the 1759 Siege of Quebec. He was in the Battle of Beaufort, and was chosen by Wolfe to lead the ascent from the Saint Lawrence River up to the Plains of Abraham that led to the British victory in the Battle of the Plains of Abraham on 13 September 1759.[5] After spending the winter in the defence of Quebec City,[6] his regiment fought in the April 1760 Battle of Sainte-Foy, and led a brigade in the capture of Montreal under Jeffery Amherst before returning to England. Howe led a brigade in the 1761 Capture of Belle Île, off the French coast, and turned down the opportunity to become military governor after its capture so that he might continue in active service.[8] He served as adjutant general of the force that captured Havana in 1762, playing a part in a skirmish at Guanabacoa.[9]

Engraving from contemporary sketch depicting the British ascent to the Plains of Abraham in 1759

In 1758, Howe was elected a member of parliament for Nottingham, succeeding to the seat vacated by his brother George's death. His election was assisted by the influence of his mother, who campaigned on behalf of her son while he was away at war,[6] and may very well have been undertaken because service in Parliament was seen as a common way to improve one's prospects for advancement in the military.[10] In 1764 he was promoted to colonel of the 46th (South Devonshire) Regiment of Foot, and in 1768 he was appointed lieutenant governor of the Isle of Wight.[6] As tensions rose between Britain and the colonies in the 1770s, Howe continued to rise through the ranks, and came to be widely regarded as one of the best officers in the army.[8] He was promoted to major general in 1772, and in 1774 introduced new training drills for light infantry companies.[6]

In Parliament he was generally sympathetic to the American colonies. He publicly opposed the collection of legislation intended to punish the Thirteen Colonies known as Intolerable Acts, and in 1774 assured his constituents that he would resist active duty against the Americans and asserted that the entire British army could not conquer America.[11] He also let government ministers know privately that he was prepared to serve in America as second in command to Thomas Gage, whom he knew was unpopular in government circles.[12] In early 1775, when King George called on him to serve, he accepted, claiming publicly that if he did not, he would suffer "the odious name of backwardness to serve my country in distress."[13] He sailed for America in March 1775, accompanied by Major Generals Henry Clinton and John Burgoyne.[14] In May 1775 his colonelcy was transferred to the 23rd Fusiliers.[15]

American War of Independence

Along with fellow British Army Generals Clinton and Burgoyne, Howe arrived at Boston aboard the "H.M.S. Cerberus" on 25 May 1775, having learned en route that war had broken out with the skirmishes at the marches to Lexington and Concord in April.[16] It provided naval reinforcement at the Battle of Bunker Hill.[16] He led a force of 4,000 troops sent to reinforce the 5,000 troops under General Thomas Gage who were besieged in the city after those battles.[14] Gage, Howe, and Generals Clinton and Burgoyne discussed plans to break the siege. They formulated a plan to seize high ground around Boston and attack the besieging colonial militia forces, setting its execution for 18 June.[17] However, the colonists learned of the plan and fortified the heights of Breed's Hill and nearby Bunker Hill on the Charlestown peninsula across the Charles River from Boston on the night of 16–17 June,[18] forcing the British leadership to rethink their strategy.

Bunker Hill and Boston

In a war council held early on 17 June, the generals developed a plan calling for a direct assault on the colonial fortification, and Gage gave Howe command of the operation. Despite a sense of urgency (the colonists were still working on the fortifications at the time of the council), the attack, now known as the Battle of Bunker Hill, did not begin until that afternoon.[19] With Howe personally leading the right wing of the attack, the first two assaults were firmly repulsed by the colonial defenders. Howe's third assault gained the objective, but the cost of the day's battle was appallingly heavy.[20] The British casualties, more than 1,000 killed or wounded, were the highest of any engagement in the war.[21] Howe described it as a "success ... too dearly bought."[22] Although Howe exhibited courage on the battlefield, his tactics and overwhelming confidence were criticised. One subordinate wrote that Howe's "absurd and destructive confidence" played a role in the number of casualties incurred.[22]

Depiction of the Battle of Bunker Hill by Percy Moran, 1909

Although Howe was not injured in the battle, it had a pronounced effect on his spirit. According to British historian George Otto Trevelyan, the battle "exercised a permanent and most potent influence" especially on Howe's behaviour, and that Howe's military skills thereafter "were apt to fail him at the very moment when they were especially wanted."[23] Despite an outward appearance of confidence and popularity with his troops, the "genial six-footer with a face some people described as 'coarse'", privately often exhibited a lack of self-confidence, and in later campaigns became somewhat dependent on his older brother Richard (the admiral in the Royal Navy, also on station in the Colonies) for advice and approval.[24]

On 11 October 1775, General Gage sailed for England, and Howe took over as Commander-in-Chief of the British Army in America.[25] British military planners in London had, with the outbreak of hostilities, begun planning a massive reinforcement of the troops in North America. Their plans, made with recommendations from Howe, called for the abandonment of Boston and the establishment of bases in New York and Newport, Rhode Island in an attempt to isolate the rebellion to New England.[26] When orders arrived in November to execute these plans, Howe opted to remain in Boston for the winter and begin the campaign in 1776.[22] As a result, the remainder of the Siege of Boston was largely a stalemate. Howe never attempted a major engagement with the Continental Army, which had come under the command of Major General George Washington.[27] He did, however, spend a fair amount of time at the gambling tables, and allegedly established a relationship with Elizabeth Lloyd Loring, the wife of Loyalist Joshua Loring, Jr. Loring apparently acquiesced to this arrangement, and was rewarded by Howe with the position of commissary of prisoners.[28] Contemporaries and historians have criticised Howe for both his gambling and the amount of time he supposedly spent with Mrs. Loring, with some going so far as to level accusations that this behaviour interfered with his military activities; historian John Alden does not give these ideas credence.[29] The alleged relationship is also mentioned in The Battle of the Kegs, an American propaganda ballad written by Francis Hopkinson. In January 1776 Howe's role as commander in chief was cemented with a promotion to full general in North America.[30]

The siege was broken in March 1776 when Continental Army Colonel Henry Knox brought heavy artillery from Fort Ticonderoga to Boston during the winter, and General Washington used them to fortify Dorchester Heights, overlooking Boston and its harbour.[31] Howe at first planned an assault on this position, but a snowstorm interfered, and he eventually decided to withdraw from Boston.[32] On 17 March, British troops and Loyalists evacuated the city, and sailed for Halifax, Nova Scotia.[27]

New York campaign

A period map depicting the British Army movements in Westchester County, New York

Howe and his troops began to arrive outside New York Harbour and made an uncontested landing on Staten Island to the west in early July.[33] Howe, whose orders from Lord George Germain, the Secretary of State responsible for directing the war from Westminster, were fairly clear that he should avoid conflict before the arrival of reinforcements, then waited until those reinforcements arrived in mid-August, along with the naval commander, his brother Richard.[34][35] This delay proved to be somewhat costly, since the Americans used this time to improve fortifications on northwestern Long Island (at Brooklyn Heights along the East River shoreline) and increased the size of their Continental Army with additional militia.[35] After moving most of his army by amphibious barges across the Verazzano Narrows to southwestern Long Island without opposition, he attacked the American positions on 27 August in what became known as the Battle of Long Island. In a well-executed manoeuvre, a large column led by Howe and Clinton passed around the American left flank, through the lightly guarded Jamaica Pass far to the east, (a ridge of hills running east to west bisected the island, with a series of lower entrances that were all guarded by Continentals except inexplicably to the farthest east at Jamaica), catching the Patriots off-guard and routing the Americans from their forward positions back into the entrenchments on Brooklyn Heights. Despite the urging of Clinton and others, Howe decided against an immediate assault on these fortifications, claiming "the Troops had for that day done handsomely enough."[36] He instead began siege operations, methodically advancing on the entrenched Americans.[37] This decision allowed General Washington to successfully orchestrate a nighttime strategic withdrawal across the East River on the night of 29–30 August, aided by a thick morning fog.[38] Historian George Bilias notes that had Howe attacked Brooklyn Heights, the capture of even half of Washington's army, and possibly Washington himself, might have had a significant effect on the rebellion.[36] Some officers, notably General Clinton, were critical of Howe's decision not to storm the American works.[39] Howe was knighted as a reward for his victory on Long Island.[30]

Howe and his brother Richard had, as part of their instructions, been assigned roles as peace commissioners, with limited authority to treat with the rebels. After Long Island, they pursued an attempt at reconciliation, sending the captured General John Sullivan to Philadelphia with a proposal for a peace conference. The meeting that resulted, conducted by Admiral Howe, was unsuccessful. The Howes had been given limited powers, as had the Congressional representatives, and the latter were insistent that the British recognise the recently declared colonial independence. This was not within the Howe's powers, so the conference failed, and Howe then continued the campaign.[40] He first landed troops on Manhattan on 15 September, and occupied New York City (which then occupied only Lower Manhattan), although his advance northward on Manhattan was checked the next day at Harlem Heights.[41] He then paused, spending nearly one month consolidating control of New York City and awaiting reinforcements.[42] During this time he ordered the execution of Nathan Hale for espionage, and had to deal with the effects of a major fire in the city.[43] He then attempted a landing on the mainland at Throgs Neck, intending to flank Washington's position at Harlem Heights. However, the narrow causeway between the beach and the mainland was well-defended, and he ended up withdrawing the troops.[44] He then made a successful landing of troops at Pell's Point in Westchester County; Washington managed to avoid being flanked, retreating to White Plains.[45] Howe successfully forced Washington out of the New York area in the 28 October Battle of White Plains, and then turned his attention to consolidate British hold on Manhattan.[46] In November he attacked the remaining Continental Army stronghold in the Battle of Fort Washington, taking several thousand prisoners.[47]

Howe often disagreed with Henry Clinton, his second in command, on military strategy.

Washington then retreated across New Jersey, followed by Howe's advance forces under Charles Cornwallis.[48] At this point, Howe prepared troops under the command of General Clinton for embarkation to occupy Newport, the other major goal of his plan. Clinton proposed that these troops instead be landed in New Jersey, either opposite Staten Island or on the Delaware River, trapping Washington or even capturing the seat of the Continental Congress, Philadelphia.[49] Howe rejected these proposals, despatching Clinton and General Hugh, Earl Percy, two vocal critics of his leadership, to take Newport.[50] In early December Howe came to Trenton, New Jersey to arrange the disposition of his troops for the winter. Washington had retreated all the way across the Delaware, and Howe returned to New York, believing the campaign to be ended for the season.[51] When Washington attacked the Hessian quarters at Trenton on 26 December 1776, Howe sent Cornwallis to reform the army in New Jersey and chase after Washington.[52] Cornwallis was frustrated in this, with Washington gaining a second victory at Trenton and a third at Princeton. Howe recalled the army to positions much closer to New York for the winter.[53]

Howe has been criticised by contemporaries and historians for failing to decisively defeat the Continental Army during the New York campaign. Contemporaries complained that his landing in Westchester failed to trap Washington, but failed to understand that his goal in the campaign was to secure Manhattan, and not necessarily to defeat Washington.[54] However, historian George Billias observes that Howe's overly rigid adherence to his plans meant that he was unable to capitalise on the opportunities that arose during the campaign for a decisive action.[55]

Philadelphia campaign

On 30 November 1776, as Washington was retreating across New Jersey, Howe had written to Germain with plans for the 1777 campaign season. He proposed to send a 10,000-man force up the Hudson River to capture Albany, New York, in conjunction with an expedition sent south from Province of Quebec. He again wrote to Germain on 20 December 1776 with more elaborate proposals for 1777. These again included operations to gain control of the Hudson River, and included expanded operations from the base at Newport, and an expedition to take Philadelphia. The latter Howe saw as attractive, since Washington was then just north of the city: Howe wrote that he was "persuaded the Principal Army should act offensively [against Philadelphia], where the enemy's chief strength lies."[56] Germain acknowledged that this plan was particularly "well digested", but it called for more men that Germain was prepared to provide.[57] After the setbacks in New Jersey, Howe in mid-January 1777 proposed operations against Philadelphia that included an overland expedition and a sea-based attack, thinking this might lead to a decisive victory over the Continental Army.[58] This plan was developed to the extent that in April, Howe's army was seen constructing pontoon bridges; Washington, lodged in his winter quarters at Morristown, New Jersey, thought they were for eventual use on the Delaware River.[59] However, by mid-May Howe had apparently abandoned the idea of an overland expedition: "I propose to invade Pennsylvania by sea ... we must probably abandon the Jersies."[60]

A 1777 mezzotint of Howe

When the campaign season opened in May 1777, General Washington moved most of his army from its winter quarters in Morristown, New Jersey to a strongly fortified position in the Watchung Mountains.[61] In June 1777, Howe began a series of odd moves in New Jersey, apparently in an attempt to draw Washington and his army out of that position onto terrain more favourable for a general engagement.[62] His motives for this are uncertain; historian John Buchanan argues that Howe was determined to attempt to draw Washington into a major engagement while both were in northern New Jersey, writing that "Washington's shift in position had whetted Howe's appetite for a major action when, if everything went right, he would finally accomplish what he and his brother's policies had denied him the previous year: the destruction of the Continental Army",[63] but that Howe's underlying campaign goal for the season was Philadelphia.[64] One British major wrote that "[t]he report circulated by those in power is that it was thought necessary to march to Hilsborough [sic] to offer Washington battle."[65] Americans like Henry Knox were perplexed but also concluded that was its purpose: "It was unaccountable that [the British] should stop short when they had gone only nine miles ... In the course of a day or two [we] discovered that they ... had come out with an intention of drawing us into the plain."[65] Washington had intelligence that Howe had moved without taking the heavy river-crossing equipment, and was apparently not fooled at all.[66]

When Washington failed to take the bait, Howe withdrew the army to Perth Amboy, under harassment by Colonel Daniel Morgan's elite light unit, Morgan's Riflemen, who used their superior weapons to snipe at and harry his forces as they moved. Washington moved down to a more exposed position, assuming Howe was going to embark his army on ships. Howe then launched a lightning strike designed to cut Washington's retreat off. This attempt was foiled by the Battle of Short Hills, which gave Washington time to retreat to a more secure position. Howe then did in fact embark his army and sailed south with his brother's fleet. Howe maintained an effective secrecy surrounding the fleet's destination: not only did Washington not know where it was going, neither did many British rank and file.[67]

Howe's campaign for Philadelphia began with an amphibious landing at Head of Elk, Maryland, southwest of the city in late August. Although Howe would have preferred to make a landing on the Delaware River below Philadelphia, reports of well-prepared defences dissuaded him, and the fleet spent almost an entire extra month at sea to reach Head of Elk.[68] Howe's army left Head of Elk early on 3 September 1777 and pushed back an advance guard of American light infantry at Cooch's Bridge. On 11 September 1777, Howe's army met Washington's near Chadds Ford along the Brandywine Creek in the Battle of Brandywine. Howe established his headquarters at the Gilpin Homestead, where it stayed until the morning of 16 September.[69] In a reprise of earlier battles, Howe once again flanked the Continental Army position and forced Washington to retreat after inflicting heavy casualties.[70]

After two weeks of manoeuvre and engagements (including The Battle of the Clouds, The Paoli Massacre, and an engagement at Valley Forge where Alexander Hamilton was nearly lost), Howe triumphantly entered the city on 26 September.[71] The reception the British received was not quite what they had expected, however. They had been led to believe that "Friends thicker than Woods" would greet them upon their arrival; they instead were greeted by women, children, and many deserted houses.[72] Despite Howe's best attempts to minimise the plundering by his army (he authorised the execution of violators of his orders against it), this activity by the army had a significant negative effect on popular support.[73]

One week after Howe entered Philadelphia, on 4 October, Washington made a dawn attack on the British garrison at Germantown. He very nearly won the battle before being repulsed by late-arriving reinforcements sent from the city.[74] This forced Howe to withdraw his troops a little closer to the city, where they were also needed to help clear the American Delaware River defences, which were preventing the navy from resupplying the army. It was late November before this task was accomplished, which included a poorly executed attack on Fort Mercer by a division of Hessians.[75]

Impact on Burgoyne's campaign

Howe made the Masters-Penn mansion his headquarters during the 1777–78 British occupation of Philadelphia. It later served as the presidential mansion of George Washington and John Adams, 1790–1800.

Concomitant with Howe's campaign, General Burgoyne led his expedition south from Montreal to capture Albany.[76] Burgoyne's advance was stopped in the Battles of Saratoga in September and October, and he surrendered his army on 17 October. Burgoyne's surrender, coupled with Howe's near defeat at Germantown, dramatically altered the strategic balance of the conflict.[77][78] Support for the Continental Congress, suffering from Howe's successful occupation of Philadelphia, was strengthened, and the victory encouraged France to enter the war against Britain.[79] Burgoyne's loss also further weakened the British government of Lord North.[80]

Burgoyne made his advance under the assumption that he would be met in Albany by Howe or troops sent by Howe.[76] Burgoyne was apparently not aware that Howe's plans had evolved as they had. Although Germain knew what Howe's plans were, whether he communicated them to Burgoyne is unclear. Some sources claim he did[81] while others state that Burgoyne was not notified of the changes until the campaign was well underway.[76] Whether Germain, Howe and Burgoyne had the same expectations about the degree to which Howe was supposed to support the invasion from Quebec is also unclear. Some historians argue that Howe failed to follow instructions and essentially abandoned Burgoyne's army, while others suggest that Burgoyne failed on his own and then tried to shift the blame to Howe and Clinton.[82]

Howe's decision to focus his own activity on an expedition to Philadelphia may have been motivated by competition with General Burgoyne, who was given command of the northern force despite lobbying by Howe for its command to be given to Clinton.[83] John Alden notes the jealousies among the British leaders, saying, "It is likely that [Howe] was as jealous of Burgoyne as Burgoyne was of him and that he was not eager to do anything which might assist his junior up the ladder of military renown."[84] Along the same lines historian Don Higginbotham concludes that in Howe's view, "It [the northern campaign] was Burgoyne's whole show, and consequently he [Howe] wanted little to do with it. With regard to Burgoyne's army, he would do only what was required of him (virtually nothing)."[85]

Howe himself wrote to Burgoyne on 17 July that he intended to stay close to Washington: "My intention is for Pennsylvania, where I expect to meet Washington, but if he goes to the northward contrary to my expectations, and you can keep him at bay, be assured I shall soon be after him to relieve you." This suggested that Howe would follow Washington if he went north to assist in the defence of the Hudson.[86] Howe, however, sailed from New York on 23 July.[87] On 30 August, shortly after his arrival at Head of Elk, Howe wrote to Germain that he would be unable to assist Burgoyne, citing a lack of Loyalist support in the Philadelphia area.[88] A small force sent north from New York by General Clinton in early October was also unable to assist Burgoyne.[89]


Artwork on the tickets to the Mischianza

In October 1777 Howe sent his letter of resignation to London, complaining that he had been inadequately supported in that year's campaigns.[6] He was finally notified in April 1778 that his resignation was accepted. A grand party, known as the "Mischianza", was thrown for the departing general on 18 May. Organized by his aides John André and Oliver De Lancey Jr., the party featured a grand parade, fireworks, and dancing until dawn.[90] Washington, aware that the British were planning to evacuate Philadelphia, sent the Marquis de Lafayette out with a small force on the night of the party to determine British movements. This movement was noticed by alert British troops, and Howe ordered a column out to entrap the marquis. In the Battle of Barren Hill, Lafayette escaped the trap with minimal casualties.[91]

On 24 May, the day Howe sailed for England, General Clinton took over as commander-in-chief of British armies in America, and made preparations for an overland march to New York.[92] Howe arrived back in England on 1 July,[93] where he and his brother faced censure for their actions in North America. It is likely that the resignation of both William and his brother Richard was due to their desire to hurry home to vindicate their conduct during the campaign.[94] In 1779 Howe and his brother demanded a parliamentary inquiry into their actions. The inquiry that followed was unable to confirm any charges of impropriety or mismanagement levelled against either of them.[6] Because of the inconclusive nature of the inquiry, attacks continued to be made against Howe in pamphlets and the press, and in 1780 he published a response to accusations levelled by Loyalist Joseph Galloway,[95] who issued a reply that harshly criticized the general's conduct and accused him of deliberately undermining the war effort for the benefit of the anti-war Whig faction in Parliament.[96]

Later life

In 1780 Howe lost in his bid to be re-elected to the House of Commons.[97] In 1782 he was named lieutenant general of the ordnance and appointed to the Privy Council. His colonelcy was transferred from the 23rd Fusiliers to the 19th Light Dragoons in 1786.[98] He resumed limited active duty in 1789, when a crisis with Spain over territorial claims in northwestern North America threatened to boil over into war. The crisis was resolved, and Howe did not see further action until 1793, when the French Revolutionary Wars involved Britain. He was promoted to full general in 1793, and commanded Northern District from 1793 and Eastern District from 1795.[6] In 1795 he was also appointed governor of Berwick-on-Tweed.[97]

When his brother Richard died in 1799 without surviving male issue, Howe inherited the Irish titles and became the 5th Viscount Howe and Baron Clenawly.[99] In 1803 he resigned as lieutenant general of the ordnance, citing poor health. In 1805 he was appointed governor of Plymouth, and died at Twickenham in 1814 after a long illness.[6][100] He was married in 1765 to Frances Connolly, but the marriage was childless, and his titles died with him.[6] His wife survived him by three years; both are buried in Twickenham.[101]

Popular Culture

Howe appears as an antagonist in the supernatural TV series Sleepy Hollow, depicted in flashbacks by Nicholas Guest and described in the present as being notorious for his brilliant tactics and ruthless cruelty. In his historical role as the British military leader in the War for Independence, Howe was acquainted with Ichabod Crane (Tom Mison) before Crane defected to America; his first major flashback appearance sees him offer Crane a chance to return to Britain if he identifies Washington's spies in the British forces, with Crane feeling guilty that he was briefly tempted by the offer. Howe also plays a key role in the crossover episodes between Sleepy Hollow and crime drama Bones; his body is discovered in a small American church in the present (characters noting that he is recorded as being buried in Twickenham), with his skull being identified as the 'murder weapon' in Bones episode "The Resurrection in the Remains", and he is resurrected as a zombie-like warrior in the following Sleepy Hollow episode "Dead Men Tell No Tales", requiring Crane to destroy him with Greek fire.


  1. 1.0 1.1 Alden (1989), p. 222
  2. 2.0 2.1 Fischer, p. 67
  3. Gruber, pp. 45–47
  4. Alden (1989), p. 223
  5. 5.0 5.1 Billias, p. 43
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 Chichester
  7. Leckie, p. 145
  8. 8.0 8.1 Gruber, p. 56
  9. Pocock, p. 208
  10. Billias, p. 44
  11. Fischer, pp. 70–71
  12. Gruber, p. 58
  13. Billias, p. 45
  14. 14.0 14.1 Ketchum (1999), p. 2
  15. Mainwaring, p. 346
  16. 16.0 16.1 Kathy Abbass and Rod Mather. "The History of the HMS Cerberus and HMS Lark". Retrieved 9 November 2013.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  17. Ketchum (1999), p. 46
  18. Ketchum (1999), pp. 110–111
  19. Willcox, p. 48
  20. Ketchum (1999), pp. 151–183
  21. Brooks, p. 237
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 Billias, p. 47
  23. Trevelyan, p. 1:338
  24. Fleming, p. 44
  25. Ketchum (1999), p. 213
  26. Gruber, p. 82
  27. 27.0 27.1 Billias, p. 48
  28. Fischer, p. 72
  29. Alden (1989), p. 504
  30. 30.0 30.1 Hadden, p. 375
  31. Ketchum (1999), pp. 214–217
  32. Ketchum (1999), p. 218
  33. Fischer, p. 32
  34. Gruber, p. 84
  35. 35.0 35.1 Billias, p. 51
  36. 36.0 36.1 Billias, p. 53
  37. Fischer, p. 99
  38. Fischer, pp. 100–101
  39. Gruber, p. 114
  40. Gruber, pp. 116–119
  41. Leckie, pp. 277–278
  42. Gruber, p. 127
  43. Fischer, pp. 106–108
  44. Gruber, pp. 129–131
  45. Gruber, pp. 131–132
  46. Fischer, pp. 110–111
  47. Fischer, p. 113
  48. Fischer, pp. 117–132
  49. Gruber, p. 135
  50. Fredriksen, p. 386
  51. Gruber, pp. 137–138
  52. Fischer, pp. 259–295
  53. Gruber, pp. 154–156
  54. Gruber, p. 133
  55. Billias, p. 55
  56. Ketchum (1997), p. 81
  57. Martin, p. 11
  58. Gruber, p. 183
  59. Ketchum (1997), p. 61
  60. Mintz, p. 117
  61. Martin, p. 22
  62. Martin, pp. 23–27
  63. Buchanan, p. 206
  64. Buchanan, pp. 198–199
  65. 65.0 65.1 McGuire, p. 39
  66. Martin, p. 23
  67. Martin, pp. 24–31
  68. Billias, pp. 60–61
  69. "National Historic Landmarks & National Register of Historic Places in Pennsylvania" (Searchable database). CRGIS: Cultural Resources Geographic Information System.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> Note: This includes Pennsylvania Register of Historic Sites and Landmarks (August 1971). "National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form: Gilpin Homestead" (PDF). Retrieved 6 January 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  70. Gruber, pp. 240–241
  71. Gruber, p. 241
  72. Gruber, p. 242
  73. Gruber, p. 243
  74. Martin, pp. 99–120
  75. Gruber, pp. 247–260
  76. 76.0 76.1 76.2 Griffith, p. 369
  77. Mintz, p. 234
  78. Trevelyan, p. 3:249
  79. Ketchum (1997), pp. 446–447
  80. Ketchum (1997), p. 442
  81. Ketchum (1997), p. 84
  82. Boatner, pp. 134–135
  83. Mintz, p. 124
  84. Alden (1954), p. 118
  85. Higginbotham, p. 180
  86. Mintz, p. 164
  87. Martin, p. 31
  88. Pancake, p. 167
  89. Ketchum (1997), p. 385
  90. Martin, p. 181
  91. Martin, pp. 182–186
  92. Martin, p. 198
  93. Gruber, p. 325
  94. Syrett, p. 74
  95. Billias, p. 62
  96. Galloway, Joseph. A reply to the observations of Lieut. Gen. Sir William Howe (1780)
  97. 97.0 97.1 Billias, p. 63
  98. Hadden, p. 379
  99. Hadden, p. 380
  100. Many sources, including the DNB, assume he was at Plymouth when he died. This is probably based on an early misreading of his obituary, published in the Gentleman's Magazine in 1814 (Gentleman's Magazine, Volume 116, p. 93). The obituary does not state he died there; an annual register records his death at Twickenham, as do the editors of Hadden's Journal. (Edinburgh Annual Register, for 1814, p. cdxlvii; Hadden, p. 380)
  101. Cokayne, p. 269


  • Alden, John R (1954). The American Revolution: 1775–1783. New York: Harper. OCLC 165049515.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Alden, John R (1989) [1969]. A History of the American Revolution. New York: Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0-306-80366-6. OCLC 19846752.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Anderson, Troyer (1936). The Command of the Howe Brothers During the American Revolution. New York and London: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-403-00816-2. OCLC 1281930.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Billias, George Athan (1969). George Washington's Opponents. New York: William Morrow. OCLC 11709.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Boatner, Mark M (1994) [1966]. Encyclopedia of the American Revolution. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books. ISBN 978-0-8117-0578-3. OCLC 29595553.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Brooks, Victor (1999). The Boston Campaign. Conshohocken, PA: Combined Publishing. ISBN 1-58097-007-9. OCLC 42581510.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Buchanan, John (2004). The Road to Valley Forge: How Washington Built the Army That Won the Revolution. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-44156-4. OCLC 231991487.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  •  Chichester, Henry M (1885–1900). [ "Howe, William (1729-1814)" ] Check |ws link in chapter= value (help). Dictionary of National Biography. London: Smith, Elder & Co.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Cokayne, George Edward (1892). Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, Extant, Extinct, or Dormant, Volume 4. London: G. Bell and Sons. OCLC 2052386.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Fischer, David Hackett (2004). Washington's Crossing. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-518159-X.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Fleming, Thomas (2006). Washington's Secret War. New York: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-082962-9. OCLC 61529854.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Fredriksen, John C (2001). America's Military Adversaries: From Colonial Times to the Present. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC–CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57607-603-3. OCLC 248864750.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Griffith, Samuel B (2002). The War for American Independence: From 1760 to the Surrender at Yorktown in 1781. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. ISBN 978-0-252-02745-1. OCLC 48222590.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Gruber, Ira (1972). The Howe Brothers and the American Revolution. New York: Atheneum Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-1229-7. OCLC 1464455.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Hadden, James M; Rogers, Horatio (1884). A Journal Kept in Canada and Upon Burgoyne's Campaign in 1776 and 1777 by Lieut. James M. Hadden. J. Munsell's Sons. OCLC 2130358.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Higginbotham, Don (1971). The War of American Independence. New York: Macmillan. OCLC 142627.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Ketchum, Richard M (1997). Saratoga: Turning Point of America's Revolutionary War. New York: Henry Holt. ISBN 978-0-8050-6123-9. OCLC 41397623.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Ketchum, Richard M (1999). Decisive Day: The Battle of Bunker Hill. New York: Owl Books. ISBN 0-385-41897-3. OCLC 24147566.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> (Paperback: ISBN 0-8050-6099-5)
  • Leckie, Robert (1993). George Washington's War: The Saga of the American Revolution. New York: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-092215-3. OCLC 29748139.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Mainwaring, Rowland Broughton (1889). Historical Record of the Royal Welch Fusiliers. London: Hatchards, Piccadilly. OCLC 220264572.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Martin, David G (1993). The Philadelphia Campaign: June 1777 – July 1778. Conshohocken, PA: Combined Books. ISBN 0-938289-19-5.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> 2003 Da Capo reprint, ISBN 0-306-81258-4.
  • McGuire, Thomas J (2006). The Philadelphia Campaign, Vol. I: Brandywine and the Fall of Philadelphia. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books. ISBN 978-0-8117-0178-5.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Mintz, Max M (1990). The Generals of Saratoga: John Burgoyne and Horatio Gates. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-04778-3. OCLC 644565187.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Pancake, John (1985). This Destructive War. University, AL: University of Alabama Press. ISBN 0-8173-0191-7. OCLC 59831925.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Pocock, Tom (1998). Battle for Empire: The Very First World War, 1756–63. London: Michael O'Mara Books. ISBN 978-1-85479-332-4. OCLC 185667821.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Syrett, David (2006). Admiral Lord Howe: A Biography. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-006-1. OCLC 70660963.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Trevelyan, George Otto (1898). The American Revolution, Part 1. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co. OCLC 20011020.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Willcox, William (1964). Portrait of a General: Sir Henry Clinton in the War of Independence. New York: Alfred A Knopf. OCLC 245684727.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • The Edinburgh Annual Register, for 1814. Edinburgh: Archibald Constable. 1816. OCLC 55271916.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • The Gentleman's Magazine, Volume 116. London: E. Cave. 1814. OCLC 7898058.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Further reading

  • Gruber, Ira D. The Howe Brothers and the American Revolution (1974)
  • Smith, David. William Howe and the American War of Independence (London: Bloomsbury, 2015) 201 pp.
  • Moomaw, W. H. "The Denouement of General Howe's Campaign of 1777". English Historical Review (Vol. 79, No. 312 (July 1964)): pp. 498–512. JSTOR 560990.CS1 maint: extra text (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Primary sources

  • Howe, Viscount William (1780). The Narrative of Lieut. Gen. Sir William Howe: in a Committee of the House of Commons, on the 29th of April, 1779, Relative to his Conduct, During his Late Command of the King's Troops in North America. London: H. Baldwin. OCLC 474948690.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> Howe's 1780 pamphlet defending his conduct in North America
  • Galloway, Joseph (1780). A Reply to the Observations of Lieut. Gen. Sir William Howe, on a Pamphlet, entitled Letters to a Nobleman. London: G. Wilkie. OCLC 671515186.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> Joseph Galloway's response to Howe's pamphlet

External links

Court offices
Preceded by
Hon. Bluett Wallop
Page of Honour
Succeeded by
Hon. George West
Parliament of Great Britain
Preceded by
The Viscount Howe
Sir Willoughby Aston, Bt
Member of Parliament for Nottingham
With: Sir Willoughby Aston, Bt 1758–1761
John Plumptre 1761–1774
Sir Charles Sedley 1774–1778
Abel Smith 1778–1779
Robert Smith 1779–1780
Succeeded by
Robert Smith
Daniel Parker Coke
Military offices
Preceded by
Hon. Thomas Murray
Colonel of the 46th Regiment of Foot
Succeeded by
Hon. John Vaughan
Preceded by
Hon. George Boscawen
Colonel of the 23rd Regiment of Foot
Succeeded by
Richard Grenville
Preceded by
Thomas Gage
Commander-in-Chief, North America
Succeeded by
Sir Henry Clinton
Preceded by
The Lord Amherst
Lieutenant-General of the Ordnance
Succeeded by
Sir Thomas Trigge
Preceded by
Sir John Burgoyne, Bt
Colonel of the 19th Regiment of (Light) Dragoons
Succeeded by
Sir William Payne, Bt
Preceded by
New Post
GOC Northern District
Succeeded by
The Duke of Gloucester and Edinburgh
Preceded by
Hon. John Vaughan
Governor of Berwick-upon-Tweed
Succeeded by
Banastre Tarleton
Preceded by
The Viscount Lake
Governor of Plymouth
Succeeded by
The Duke of Richmond
Peerage of Ireland
Preceded by
Richard Howe
Viscount Howe