Women in heraldry

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Due to the differing role of women in past society, special rules grew relating to the blazoning of arms for women. In both the English[1] and the Scottish[2] systems of heraldry these differences remain active. In other nations, in Canadian heraldry for example, women may inherit arms on an equal basis with their brothers (if any). Women in Canada may also transmit their arms to their heirs, regardless of gender. This system of equality for men and women is a result of provisions in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantee, among other things, freedom from discrimination under the law on the basis of sex.[3]

British Heraldry

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

The coat of arms of Baroness Thatcher: in some heraldic traditions, the arms of women are displayed in a lozenge, as opposed to a shield.

In English, Scottish and Northern Irish heraldry, a woman may bear arms by inheritance from her father[4] or by grant to herself. When unmarried, she displays her arms on a lozenge (a diamond shape) or on an oval or oval-like shape. Traditionally, a woman does not display her arms on a shield, as the shield originated with knights and warfare, and is thus viewed as fitting for a man, but not a woman.[citation needed]

The arms of the Duchess of Cambridge (right) impaled with those of her husband, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge (left)

When married, a woman has the option of uniting her arms with those of her husband in what are called marital arms; their arms are impaled, meaning they are placed side by side in the same shield, with those of the man on the dexter (left, as seen from the front) and those of his wife on the sinister (right, as seen from the front).[5] If one spouse belongs to the higher ranks of an order of chivalry, and is thereby entitled to surround his or her arms with a circlet of the order, it is usual to depict them on two separate shields tilted towards one another, this is termed "accollé".[citation needed]

Coat of Arms of Birgitte, Duchess of Gloucester who is a heraldic heiress. Depicting her father's arms imposed over those of Prince Richard, Duke of Gloucester, her husband.

A married woman may also bear either her own arms or her husband's arms alone on a shield with a small differencing mark to distinguish her from her father or husband.[citation needed]

Heraldic Heiresses

If the woman is an heraldic heiress, her arms are shown on an inescutcheon of pretence, which is a small shield in the centre of her husband's arms. When widowed, a woman continues to use her marital arms, but placed on a lozenge or oval.[citation needed] In England and Northern Ireland, if there is more than one surviving daughter, each transmits her father's arms on equal terms.[6] In Scotland however, only the eldest surviving daughter transmits her father's undifferenced arms to her offspring.[7]

Canadian Heraldry

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

File:Sauve-arms.jpg
The arms of Jeanne Sauvé, former Governor General of Canada, displayed in a shield

In Canadian heraldry, women and men are treated equally for heraldic purposes, as required by Canadian equality laws.[8] It is therefore common to display the arms of women on shields, rather than on a lozenge or oval, but a woman may still choose to have her arms displayed on a traditional shape.

Cadency

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

In many systems of heraldry, the arms of each living person must be unique. English heraldry has used armorial variants to distinguish the arms of brothers from their father's arms and from each other since the thirteenth century;[9] this is now normally done by the system of marks or brisures set up by the early Tudor herald John Writhe.[1] Canada adds a unique series of brisures for use by female children who inherit arms. As in other heraldic systems, these cadency marks are not always used;[10] in any case, when the heir succeeds (in Canada, the first child, whether male or female, according to strict primogeniture), the mark of cadency is removed and the heir uses the plain coat of arms.[2]

Brisures
First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Seventh Eighth Ninth
Daughter
50x50px
25x25px
50x50px
50x50px
50x50px
50x50px
50x50px
50x50px
60x60px
heart
ermine spot
snowflake
fir twig
chess rook
escallop
harp
buckle
clarion
Son
75x75px
50x50px
50x50px
50x50px
An heraldic annulet (ring)
50x50px
50x50px
A cross moline, an equilateral cross with split and curved ends
40x40px
label of three points
crescent
mullet
martlet
annulet
fleur-de-lys
rose
cross moline
double quatrefoil[N 1]
  1. Also known as an octofoil[10]

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Friar 1993, p. 181.
  7. Burnett 1997, p. 46.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.