A259 road

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

A259 road shield

A259 road
A259 road map.png
Route information
Length: 118.5 mi[1] (190.7 km)
Major junctions
East end: Folkestone
  [ M 20  ] M20 motorway
A20 A20 road
A21 A21 road
A22 A22 road
A23 A23 road
A24 A24 road
A26 A26 road
A27 A27 road
A29 A29 road
A261 A261 road
A268 A268 road
A269 A269 road
A280 A280 road
A283 A283 road
A284 A284 road
A289 A289 road
A2010 A2010 road
A2021 A2021 road
A2023 A2023 road
A2025 A2025 road
A2032 A2032 road
A2033 A2033 road
A2036 A2036 road
A2070 A2070 road
A2101 A2101 road
A2102 A2102 road
A2270 A2270 road
A2290 A2290 road
West end: Emsworth
Location
Primary
destinations:		 Bexhill-on-Sea
Brighton
Bognor Regis
Chichester
Eastbourne
Folkestone
Hastings
Littlehampton
Worthing
Rye
Shoreham-by-Sea
Road network

The A259 is a road on the south coast of England passing through Hampshire, West Sussex, East Sussex and part of Kent. Part of the road was named "the most dangerous road in South East England" in 2008,[2] and the BBC named the road as the 'most crash prone A road' in the UK with 7,721 crashes and 120 deaths over 12 years from 1999–2010, an average of 65 crashes per mile.[1]

Description

A view along the A259 just outside Brookland

The A259 is a busy two-lane road running along the south coast of England; part is almost parallel to the A27 road. The A259 runs east from Emsworth in Hampshire, into West Sussex via Chichester, Bognor Regis, Littlehampton, Ferring, Worthing, Lancing, Shoreham-by-Sea, Portslade And East Sussex via Hove, Brighton, Peacehaven, Newhaven, Seaford, Eastbourne, Pevensey, Bexhill, Hastings and Rye. Over the border in Kent, it continues through New Romney and Hythe to terminate at Folkestone.

The road passes through the town of Winchelsea, England's first new town. The road has Trunk Road status between Pevensey and Brenzett (A2070) and forms part of the South Coast Trunk Road.[3] This section of A259 is almost entirely single-carriageway, with only a short stretch of urban dual carriageway in Bexhill.

Road safety

In June 2008, a 12 miles (19 km) stretch of the A259 between Hastings and Eastbourne was named as the most dangerous road in the South East of England.

Landmarks

History

In 1989 the government of the day proposed to dual the road from Pevensey to Bexhill and make other corridor improvements as detailed in their Roads for Prosperity white paper and would have included the following elements: 'Guestling and Icklesham bypass', the'Winchelsea bypass', 'Rye bypass', 'Ham Street bypass', 'A259 New Romney bypass' and the 'A259 St. Mary's Bay and Dymchurch bypass'.[4] This scheme along with many others proposed at the time were shelved in 1996-7 after a number of major road protests in the UK.

Plans for a 'Hastings Bexhill bypass' which would have provided a dual-carriageway from the Pevensey roundabout passing to the north of Bexhill and Hastings to join the current A259 near Icklesham at a cost of £120-£130 million were rejected in 2001. The scheme, which was supported by the South East England Regional Assembly and by the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott was opposed by English Nature who highlighted the damage to a number of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), including the High Weald area of outstanding natural beauty. They were also concerned about the negative effect the scheme would have on several ancient woodlands and the habitats of the dormouse and great crested newt.[5][6]

The section between Brenzett and Folkestone was de-trunked in 2003 (i.e. removed trunk road status) and control reverted to Kent County Council.[7]

Other development proposals for the road were considered in 2004.[8]

It was named as one of the most dangerous road in South East England in 2008.[9]

Proposed developments

Bexhill to Hastings link road

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Proposed route of the Bexhill Hastings Link Road

East Sussex County Council has proposed building a new link road between Bexhill and Hastings, which would form a 3.5 miles (5.6 km) long road from its junction with the A259 in Bexhill to a junction with the B2092 Queensway in Hastings.[10]

The South East Regional Assembly included the scheme within its Regional Funding Advice package.[11] This was provisionally signed off in July 2009 by the Department for Transport, with the caveat that individual schemes would still need to be assessed for value for money and compatibility with greenhouse gas emission targets.[12] Although originally estimated at £45 million, the scheme is now expected to cost over £100 million. £33 million was expected to come from developer contributions, but the County Council has been unable to obtain them. "Although opportunities will be explored to seek developer contributions in the future, at the present it has been considered prudent to plan to fund all future local contributions from the County Council’s capital programme".[13]

The County Council says that "The driving force of the scheme is to enable essential economic regeneration for Bexhill and Hastings, which is currently compromised by the poor accessibility within and between the two towns... the Bexhill Hastings Link Road would make a major contribution to meeting the need to improve access between the towns and linking Trunk Roads which serve the area". They also identify that scheme would provide "faster and more reliable access to the Conquest Hospital", "easier access to jobs", "create access to much-needed additional housing"; and that it would "re-route traffic from less suitable roads" and "reduce the number of accidents on local roads".[14]

A number of organisations have objected to the scheme. The Hastings Alliance,[15] which is supported by 11 national bodies including the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England, the Council for National Parks and WWF-UK and also 16 local groups[16] points to the Hastings Five Point Plan, commissioned by the South East Regional Assembly, which found that the key requirement for regeneration is to "improve the strategic accessibility of Hastings – that is Hastings’ access to London, other major towns, and other parts of the South East" and says that improving rail links are fundamental to regenerating that area.[17] In addition they objected to the impact on the Combe Haven valley, a Site of Special Scientific Interest, which would be cut in two by the scheme. The Campaign for Better Transport say that, contrary to Government guidance, the County Council "has never really considered whether building a link road is the best way to improve transport on the Sussex coast".[18] The Woodland Trust also object as the road would seriously impact on the Marline Valley Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest, an ancient ghyll woodland. This sort of woodland is only found on steep sided valleys and are hugely important for wildlife but are highly sensitive to pollution. The road would also pass within metres of Church wood (ancient woodland) and other nationally and locally protected wildlife sites.[19] Friends of the Earth are concerned that building roads generates more traffic in the surrounding area and in particular would result in more vehicles using the roads to the north creating pressure in for communities on the approach roads[20] (such as the A21 and the A28). They also believe is would create pressure to build a 'Hastings Eastern Bypass' which would pass through the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) which they claim is one of Britain’s finest landscapes. The Sussex Wildlife Trust "strongly objects" to the road stating that "the environmental damage that will result from this scheme is unacceptable and will alter the ecology of the Combe Haven valley for ever."[21]

A public inquiry into the scheme started on 10 November 2009.[22]

A21 Baldslow Junction Improvements

If the Bexhill to Hastings Link Road is approved then changes would need to be made to the A21 Baldslow / Queensway (which would lead to the proposed link road). Work would be completed 2015 at a cost of between £90 and £100 million.[23]

'£5m improvements near Shoreham'

Brighton and Hove City Council, Adur District Council and West Sussex County Council and the Shoreham Port Authority are proposing to spend a £5million grant from the DfT to 'improve the A259 in relation to a new project to build 10,000 homes scheme.[24]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

Script error: No such module "Attached KML".

Retrieved from "https://infogalactic.com/w/index.php?title=A259_road&oldid=798124"