Beth Doe

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Beth Doe
Digital image created from study of morgue photographs to depict an estimation of the victim in life
Most recent facial reconstruction of the victim, created in May 2015
Born 1951 - 1962 (approximate)
Status Unidentified for Script error: The function "age_generic" does not exist.
Died c. December 13–19, 1976
Cause of death Homicide by strangulation
Body discovered December 20, 1976
Resting place Laurytown Road Cemetery, Weatherly, Carbon County, Pennsylvania, USA
Ethnicity Unknown, most likely Western or Central European
Known for Unidentified victim of homicide
Height 4 ft 11 in (1.50 m) (minimum)
5 ft 4 in (1.63 m) (maximum)
Weight 140 lb (64 kg) to 150 lb (68 kg)
Children 1 (at least; unborn)
Website Facebook

Beth Doe (known officially as Incident No. N3-27244)[1] is the name given to an unidentified young European-American woman who was found murdered on December 20, 1976, in White Haven, Pennsylvania. The brutality of the crime, the fact that she was pregnant when she was killed and the length of time that she has remained unidentified have created national attention.[2]

Death and discovery

Beth Doe, who was carrying a nine-month female fetus, had been strangled and shot in the neck by an unknown person. Her body was then dismembered with a serrated blade.[3] Her nose, breasts, and ears were severed and have never been found.[4][5]

The parts of her body and that of her unborn daughter were then placed into three suitcases, two were striped with red, blue, and white, and the other one was tan with a plaid design.[1][6] They were of vinyl material and were of the same size.[7][8] It was evident that the suitcases had been spray-painted black at some point and that their handles had been severed.[6][9][10]

To dispose of the body, the suitcases were thrown off a bridge over the Lehigh River in White Haven, Pennsylvania, along Interstate 80.[11][12] They fell about 300 feet before hitting the ground.[13] It is believed that the suitcases were thrown out of a vehicle travelling west.[14][15][16] The killer most likely intended to have the suitcases land in the water below, to lessen the chance of their being found.[17] Two of the suitcases landed in the woods, 20 feet from the river, and the third, containing the head and fetus, was found on the river's bank.[8][9]

Beth Doe's body was found by a teenage boy at approximately 4:30 p.m., within 7 hours to a week after her death.[17][18][19][20][21]

Due to the having fallen a long distance, two of the suitcases had opened and parts of the body had emerged. The head, fetus, and the two halves of the torso were exposed.[8][22][23]

Other evidence included straw, packaging foam, a bedspread, and waterlogged fragments of a newspaper later determined to have been The New York Sunday from September 26, 1976.[1][4][24] The bedding and newspaper fragments had been wrapped over some of the body parts.[25] The newspaper was linked to the northern part of New Jersey, where the perpetrator may have had ties.[10] The bedspread in the suitcases had a reddish-orange color, was made of chenille fabric, and was wrapped around some of the body. It had yellow and pink embroidered flowers.[1][6][8]

Investigation

Reconstructions of the three suitcases in which Beth Doe was found.

After the body was found, the victim was fingerprinted. Her teeth examined and recorded on a dental chart.[13][22][23][26]

The medical examiner noted that it appeared that a set of numbers had been written on the victim's body, most likely with a pen. The ink, believed to have originated from a pen, was located on the left hand of the victim, indicating that she was right-handed if she had written it herself. The writing consisted of the letters WSR and the numbers 4 or 5, followed by 4 or 7.[10]

Her fingerprints were submitted to the FBI, but they did not match anyone in national databases.[1][14] When she remained unidentified for some time, a sketch was made and the public was asked for assistance. However, this obtained few solid leads.[12][15] Information about the case was subsequently published across the country in an attempt to generate leads.[27]

In 2007, her remains were exhumed to obtain additional forensic evidence and to create a new facial reconstruction.[28][29] The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children has also released two reconstructions, the latest in May 2015.[10][18]

Eight missing women have been excluded as a possible identity of Beth Doe:

  • Annastaes Banitskas of Australia[30]
  • Iris Brown of Vermont
  • Valerie Cuccia of New York
  • Teresa Fittin of Florida
  • Trenny Gibson of Tennessee
  • Anna Leatherwood of Tennessee
  • Georgia Nolan of Kentucky
  • Denise Sheehy of New York[19]

Examination and physical description

File:Beth Doe original.jpg
Original sketch of the victim, created around the time her body was found.
External images
image icon 2015 reconstruction with long hair
image icon Reconstructed bedding
image icon Previous reconstruction

The body was removed by authorities and was transported in plastic bags to the nearby Gnadden Huetten Hospital for examination.[4][31]

After a three-hour autopsy on December 23, 1976, it was that she was a white woman in her late teens or early twenties. However, her identity could not be determined.[15][32][4][33] The cause of death was determined to be strangulation, although she had been shot in the neck as well.[34]

Beth Doe was between 4 feet 11 inches and 5 feet 4 inches tall. She weighed 140 to 150 pounds (due to her pregnancy}.[5] Her hair, which was shoulder-length, was an undyed dark brown. The medical examiner also classified her blood as type O.[5] She also had some distinctive markings on her body. A 2 to 6 inch scar was visible above one of her heels.[1][8][32] Two moles on her face, one above her left eye and one on her cheek, may have developed during her pregnancy.[5][8]

At some point during her life, prior to her becoming a teen, some of her molars had been extracted, and she had received fillings in her teeth. However, she had likely not seen a dentist recently, as she was suffering from severe tooth decay.[18]

It is believed that she was probably born in Europe and moved to the United States before becoming a teenager, as examination of her tooth enamel indicated.[10] Isotope testing was conducted on her hair, teeth, and bones.[35] She had lived in the United States for 5 to 10 years, and most likely had resided in Tennessee or some nearby state.[10][36][37][18][16]

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  13. 13.0 13.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  14. 14.0 14.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  16. 16.0 16.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  17. 17.0 17.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. open access publication - free to read
  23. 23.0 23.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  28. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. open access publication - free to read
  32. 32.0 32.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.open access publication - free to read
  35. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links