Category:Wikipedia essays
<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
__EXPECTUNUSEDCATEGORY__ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
This category contains Wikipedia essays — project pages on Wikipedia-related topics, but with no official status. Pages tagged with Script error: No such module "Template link general". categorize here if they are in the Wikipedia namespace and into Category:User essays if they are in userspace. Please use more specific templates where appropriate:
- Script error: No such module "Template link general".
- Script error: No such module "Template link general".
- Script error: No such module "Template link general".
- Script error: No such module "Template link general".
- Script error: No such module "Template link general".
- Script error: No such module "Template link general".
- Script error: No such module "Template link general".
- Script error: No such module "Template link general".
- Script error: No such module "Template link general".
- Script error: No such module "Template link general".
- Script error: No such module "Template link general".
- Script error: No such module "Template link general".
- Script error: No such module "Template link general".
Essays in the Wikipedia namespace may be edited by anyone. Essays in the User namespace are normally edited only by the user that hosts the page and are categorized with Category:User essays, usually via {{user essay}}. User essays may be moved categorically into the Wikipedia namespace and this category if they are frequently referenced, as evidenced by becoming an evolving expression of multiple editors. Wikipedia essays may be moved into userspace (or deleted) if they are found to be unhelpful or to contradict a settled point of policy.
Subcategories
This category has the following 17 subcategories, out of 17 total.
*
A
B
D
E
G
H
S
V
W
Pages in category "Wikipedia essays"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 546 total.
(previous page) (next page)A
- Infogalactic:A nice cup of tea and a sit down
- Infogalactic:Abundance and redundancy
- Infogalactic:Accepting other users
- Infogalactic:Add wikilinked sections to balance NPOV
- Infogalactic:Admin buddies
- Infogalactic:Admin functions that should be performed only by admins who are adults
- Infogalactic:Adrenaline junkie
- Infogalactic:Advanced template coding
- Infogalactic:Advice for new administrators
- Infogalactic:Advice for parents
- Infogalactic:Age and adminship
- Infogalactic:Alternative outlets
- Infogalactic:An unfinished house is a real problem
- Infogalactic:Analysis of Template:Convert problems
- Infogalactic:Anonymity
- Infogalactic:Apology
- Infogalactic:Appeals to Jimbo
- Infogalactic:Arguments to avoid in adminship discussions
- Infogalactic:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
- Infogalactic:Argumentum ad Jimbonem
- Infogalactic:Articles for deletion is not a war zone
- Infogalactic:Articles must be written
- Infogalactic:Assume high intelligence
- Infogalactic:Assume the assumption of good faith
- Infogalactic:Attempting to Improve
- Infogalactic:Attribution/FAQ
- Infogalactic:Avoid mission statements
- Infogalactic:Avoid Parkinson's Bicycle Shed Effect
- Infogalactic:Avoid personal remarks
- Infogalactic:Avoid repeated arguments
- Infogalactic:Avoid thread mode
- Infogalactic:Avoiding common mistakes
- Infogalactic:Award barnstars
B
- Infogalactic:Back to top
- Infogalactic:Balance Your Perspectives
- Infogalactic:Barnstaritis
- Infogalactic:Basic copyright issues
- Infogalactic:Basic dignity
- Infogalactic:Be a reliable source
- Infogalactic:Be a sweetums
- Infogalactic:Be firm
- Infogalactic:Being perfect
- Infogalactic:Beware of the tigers
- Infogalactic:Bloopers and continuity errors
- Infogalactic:BLP examples for discussion
- Infogalactic:Borderline biographies
- Infogalactic:Bots are annoying
- Infogalactic:But it's true!
C
- Infogalactic:Cabals
- Infogalactic:Call a spade a spade
- Infogalactic:Can I use this work?
- Infogalactic:Case-by-case
- Infogalactic:Catch Once and Leave
- Infogalactic:Categories are different from articles
- Infogalactic:Categories versus lists
- Infogalactic:Categorising fiction
- Infogalactic:Cemeteries
- Infogalactic:Central aspects of BLP
- Infogalactic:Citation overkill
- Infogalactic:Cite tendentious texts directly
- Infogalactic:Civil POV pushing
- Infogalactic:Clergy by nationality
- Infogalactic:Cluocracy
- Infogalactic:Coherence and cohesion
- Infogalactic:College and university article advice
- Infogalactic:Colors of political parties in the Netherlands
- Infogalactic:Common sense on courtesy
- Infogalactic:Common sense and decision making
- Infogalactic:Common sense is not common
- Infogalactic:Comparison of guidelines
- Infogalactic:Comparison to Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Infogalactic:Competence is required
- Infogalactic:Complete bollocks
- Infogalactic:Concept limit
- Infogalactic:Content authoritarianism
- Infogalactic:Contribute what you know or are willing to learn more about
- Infogalactic:Contribute where qualified
- Infogalactic:Convenience link
- Infogalactic:Copyright or Trademark
- Infogalactic:Cowboy adminship
- Infogalactic:Crash Course in Wikipedianism
- Infogalactic:Criticism
- Infogalactic:Cross-namespace redirects
- Infogalactic:Crying "BLP!"
D
- Infogalactic:Dark side of Wikipedia
- Infogalactic:Dealing with coordinated vandalism
- Infogalactic:Dealing with dictionary definitions
- Infogalactic:Delete the junk
- Infogalactic:Deletion and deletionism
- Infogalactic:Deny recognition
- Infogalactic:Describing points of view
- Infogalactic:Dig
- Infogalactic:Discussing cruft
- Infogalactic:Disruption not considered cool
- Infogalactic:Dissent is not disloyalty
- Infogalactic:Disturbing or upsetting content
- Infogalactic:Divisiveness
- Infogalactic:Divulging personal details
- Infogalactic:Do not insult the vandals
- Infogalactic:Do not trust others
- Infogalactic:Do not write articles using categories
- Infogalactic:Does deletion help
- Infogalactic:Don't assume
- Infogalactic:Don't be a fanatic
- Infogalactic:Don't be a wuss
- Infogalactic:Don't be ashamed
- Infogalactic:Don't be prejudiced
- Infogalactic:Don't bite the researchers
- Infogalactic:Don't build the Frankenstein
- Infogalactic:Don't call the kettle black
- Infogalactic:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
- Infogalactic:Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
- Infogalactic:Don't draw misleading graphs
- Infogalactic:Don't fight fire with fire
- Infogalactic:Don't go out of your way to be diplomatic
- Infogalactic:Don't judge an article by its title
- Infogalactic:Don't lie
- Infogalactic:Don't misuse the Current Events template
- Infogalactic:Don't overload your watchlist!
- Infogalactic:Don't overuse quotes
- Infogalactic:Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
- Infogalactic:Don't panic
- Infogalactic:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus"
- Infogalactic:Don't shoot yourself in the foot
- Infogalactic:Don't stuff beans up your nose
- Infogalactic:Don't take the bait
- Infogalactic:Don't tear others' heads off
- Infogalactic:Don't template the regulars
- Infogalactic:Don't use line breaks
- Infogalactic:Don't-give-a-fuckism
- Infogalactic:Drama
- Infogalactic:Dynamic tension
E
- Infogalactic:Edit count
- Infogalactic:Edit this proposal
- Infogalactic:Editing controversial subjects
- Infogalactic:Editing scientific articles
- Infogalactic:Editing the interface
- Infogalactic:Editor integrity
- Infogalactic:Editorial Committee
- Infogalactic:Editorial findings
- Infogalactic:Editors are not mindreaders
- Infogalactic:Editors have pride
- Infogalactic:Editors will sometimes be wrong
- Infogalactic:Editsummarisis
- Infogalactic:Enjoy yourself
- Infogalactic:Escalating alphabeticals
- Infogalactic:Essays are not policy
- Infogalactic:Evaluating Wikipedia as an encyclopedia
- Infogalactic:Exceptions should leave the rule intact
- Infogalactic:Exclusion (essay)
- Infogalactic:Existence ≠ Notability
- Infogalactic:Experiment
- Infogalactic:Expert editors
- Infogalactic:Expert rebellion
- Infogalactic:Expert retention
- Infogalactic:Explanationism
- Infogalactic:Explode
- Infogalactic:Expressing thanks
F
- Infogalactic:Fact laundering
- Infogalactic:Facts precede opinions
- Infogalactic:Failure
- Infogalactic:Fair use overuse
- Infogalactic:False consensus
- Infogalactic:Famous Residents
- Infogalactic:Fancruft
- Infogalactic:Featured article advice
- Infogalactic:Featured articles may have problems
- Infogalactic:Fictitious references
- Infogalactic:Fire (essay)
- Infogalactic:FLAG-BAND
- Infogalactic:FLAG-BIO
- Infogalactic:FLAG-FICT
- Infogalactic:FLAG-INC
- Infogalactic:FLAG-MOVIE
- Infogalactic:FLAG-PROF
- Infogalactic:FLAG-PROTOCOL
- Infogalactic:FLAG-WEB
- Infogalactic:Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
- Infogalactic:Follow the leader
- Infogalactic:Forgive and forget
- Infogalactic:Free speech
- Infogalactic:Freedom of panorama
- Infogalactic:Fun
- Infogalactic:Funding Wikipedia through advertisements
- Infogalactic:Further reading
- Infogalactic:Future event
G
- Infogalactic:General overview article
- Infogalactic:Get over it
- Infogalactic:Getting to Philosophy
- Infogalactic:GFDL upgrade
- Infogalactic:Give 'em enough rope
- Infogalactic:Give an article a chance
- Infogalactic:Global, cross-wiki, integrated watchlists
- Infogalactic:Good editing practices
- Infogalactic:Good enough point of view
- Infogalactic:Grandmothering
- Infogalactic:Gray Area
- Infogalactic:Gray lines