European Citizens' Initiative
European Union |
![]() This article is part of a series on the |
Policies and issues
|
The European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) was introduced with the Treaty of Lisbon, aimed at increasing direct democracy in the European Union. The initiative enables one million citizens of the European Union, who are nationals of at least one quarter of the member states, to call directly on the European Commission to propose a legal act in an area where the Member States have conferred powers onto the EU level.[1] This right to request the Commission to initiate a legislative proposal puts citizens on the same footing as the EP and the Council, who enjoy this right according to Art. 225 and 241 TFEU, respectively. The Commission holds the right of initiative in the EU. The start of the ECI was marked on 9 May 2012 (Europe Day) with the registration of Fraternité 2020.
Contents
Historical background
The ECI has its origins in the Constitutional Convention on the Future of Europe in 2002-2003. Thanks to the tireless campaign work of pro-democracy activists and like-minded Convention members the ECI was introduced in a last-minute act into the Constitutional Treaty.[2][3]
In 2005, the Constitutional Treaty was rejected by the citizens of France and the Netherlands in two national referendums. In response, the heads of state decided to adopt 95% of the content of this rejected treaty and name it the Treaty of Lisbon – which was not put to the citizens for public approval except only in Ireland.
On 13 December 2007, the Treaty of Lisbon was signed by all the EU Member States. On 11 November 2009, the European Commission published a Green Paper on the European Citizens’ Initiative, launching a public consultation process on the ECI.[4]
The Council and the Commission came up with a preliminary compromise on 14 June 2010. After having produced several drafts and opinions that were discussed in the Constitutional Affairs and Petitions Committees, on 15 December 2010 the European Parliament finally voted on the ECI Regulation. After one year of negotiations, on 16 February 2011 all three main EU institutions: the European Commission, the Council and the European Parliament agreed on a final ECI Regulation.
Of note, Switzerland, which is not a member of the European Union, has several tools of direct democracy, such as the federal popular initiative (since 1848) and the optional referendum (since 1874).
Legal basis
The legal basis of the citizens' initiative is set out in Article 11, Paragraph 4 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and Article 24, paragraph 1 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Both articles were newly introduced with the Treaty of Lisbon. The ECI complements the existing right of petition the European Parliament and the right of appeal to the Ombudsman as set out in the Treaty of Maastricht (1993). Petitions and the ECI are fundamentally different however in terms of function, addressees and conditions.[5]
The practical arrangements, conditions and procedure of the ECI have been determined in the Regulation 211/2011 on the citizens' initiative, adopted by the EP and the Council.[6] The act is applicable since 1 April 2012. An additional legal act related to the European citizens’ initiative is the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1179/2011 laying down technical specifications for online collection systems.[7]
The regulation requires a review by 1 April 2015, and every three years thereafter. In the review process, the Commission presents a report on the implementation of the ECI regulation with a view to its possible revision, to which the European Parliament reacts in a report with further recommendations.
Initiatives
Before the entry into force
Greenpeace collected one million signatures in December 2010 for a petition against the authorisation of new GM crops in Europe, hosted by Avaaz.[8] Although Greenpeace has called the petition an ECI in the media, it has never been formally registered with the Commission - as this was not possible before 1 April 2012 - and can therefore not be regarded an ECI as introduced by the Lisbon Treaty.
The first registered initiative
The European Commission chose the symbolic date of 9 May 2012 (Europe Day) to officially launch the very first ECI. This turned out to be Fraternité 2020, which was announced by Vice-President of the Commission Maroš Šefčovič via his Twitter account already one day earlier.[9] Fraternité 2020 was officially registered on 9 May and boasts registration number ECI(2012)000001.[10]
The first three successful initiatives
Right2Water
On the 21 March 2013, Right2Water became the first ECI to collect more than a million signatures and they reached the minimum quota of signatures in 7 countries on the 7 May 2013. They stopped the signature collection on the 7 September 2013 with a total of 1,857,605 signatures. The initiative was submitted to the Commission in December 2013 and the public hearing took place on the 17 February 2014 at the European Parliament.[11] In March 2014 the Commission has adopted the Communication in response to the Right2Water initiative.[12] On the 1 July 2015 the Roadmap for the evaluation of the Drinking Water Directive has been published.[13]
One of Us
On the 28 February 2014 One of us has been submitted to the Commission as a second ECI having gathered 1.896.852 signatures (so far, the highest number of signatures per ECI). A public hearing on the initiative has taken place at the European Parliament on the 10 April 2014.[14] On the 28 May 2014 the European Commission has adopted the Communication on the European Citizens' Initiative "One of us".[15]
Stop Vivisection
On the 3 March 2015 the third European Citizens' Initiative having gathered the required number of signatories, Stop Vivisection, has been submitted to the Commission. This volunteer-driven campaign collected 1.326.807 signatures. On the 11 May 2015 a public hearing at the European Parliament has taken place.[16] On the 3 June 2015 the European Commission has adopted the Communication on the European Citizens' Initiative "Stop Vivisection".[17]
---
To follow further actions in response to the successful ECI's visit Commission's page, which provides a summary of the follow-up actions.
Later approved ECIs
More initiatives have later been registered by the Commission and include among others (in order of registration):[18]
- Fraternité 2020, on EU exchange programmes;[19]
- Right to Water, on affordable and non-privatized access to clean water;[20]
- One of Us, against the use of human embryos in research;[21]
- Stop Vivisection, against animal experiments;[22]
- High Quality European Education for All;
- Pour une gestion responsible des déchets, contre les incinérateurs;
- Suspension of the EU Climate & Energy Package;
- Central public online collection platform for the European Citizen Initiative;
- European Initiative for Media Pluralism, against political interference and excessive concentration;[23]
- Single Communication Tariff Act aka One Single Tariff, on roaming fees;
- Unconditional Basic Income - Exploring a pathway towards emancipatory welfare conditions in the EU, on the case for a European basic income;[24]
- End Ecocide in Europe A Citizens’ Initiative to give the Earth Rights;[25][26]
- Let me vote, on expanding voting rights for foreigners.
- 30kmh - making streets liveable!, a regular speed limitation(30 km/h) in cities and villages, with local authorities deciding on exceptions on their street network. An initiative for security and environmental reasons;[27]
To see the full list of registered ECI's go here.
Rejected ECIs
While the first few ECIs have been approved, a few have been rejected. Among these are:
- A European Citizens Initiative campaigning to phase out nuclear energy in the EU - My voice against nuclear energy;[28][29]
- A European Citizens Initiative to recommend singing the European Anthem in Esperanto;[30]
- A European Citizens Initiative to stop TTIP.[31] The alliance of organisations behind the petition have submitted a complaint in the European Court of Justice against this decision of the European Commission.[32][33]
To see the full list of rejected ECI's go here.
Withdrawn ECIs
Number of ECI's have decided to withdraw after being approved. Among them for example:
- Happy Cows, on animal welfare of dairy cows;[34]
- Abolish Freedom of Movement for Swiss People, also known as Swissout, on repealing the agreement between EU and Swiss on the free movement of persons.[35]
To see the full list of withdrawn ECI's go here.
Procedure
Member State | Signatories |
---|---|
Austria (A) | 14,250 |
Belgium (B) | 16,500 |
Bulgaria (BG) | 13,500 |
Croatia (HR) | 9,000 |
Cyprus (CY) | 4,500 |
Czech Republic (CZ) | 16,500 |
Denmark (DK) | 9,750 |
Estonia (EST) | 4,500 |
Finland (FIN) | 9,750 |
France (F) | 55,500 |
Germany (D) | 74,250 |
Greece (GR) | 16,500 |
Hungary (H) | 16,500 |
Ireland (IRL) | 9,000 |
Italy (I) | 54,750 |
Latvia (LV) | 6,750 |
Lithuania (LT) | 9,000 |
Luxembourg (L) | 4,500 |
Malta (M) | 4,500 |
Netherlands (NL) | 19,500 |
Poland (PL) | 38,250 |
Portugal (P) | 16,500 |
Romania (RO) | 24,750 |
Slovakia (SK) | 9,750 |
Slovenia (SLO) | 6,000 |
Spain (E) | 40,500 |
Sweden (S) | 15,000 |
United Kingdom (GB) | 54,750 |
There are a few steps absolutely necessary to organise an ECI:[36][37]
- Step 1: Prepare the initiative and set up a citizens' committee: the members of this committee (at least 7 EU citizens, who must live in at least 7 different EU countries, old enough to vote in European Parliament elections) designate from among them a representative and a substitute to speak and act on its behalf vis-à-vis the Commission;[38]
- Step 2: Registration of the ECI in one of the 23 official EU languages on the Commission's website (answer of the commission within two months);[39]
- Step 3: For the use of an online signature collection get your system certified (by national authorities, answer within 1 months);[40][41]
- Step 4: Collection of statements of support (max. 12 months): you need to have a minimum number of signatories in at least seven EU countries on the way to 1 million (see the thresholds for each country in the table below).[42]
- Step 5: Get statements of support in each EU country certified by the national authority (answer within 3 months);[43][44]
- Step 6: Submit the ECI to the Commission.[45]
For tips on how to organise a successful ECI campaign go here. Check out also practicioner's checklist.
Weaknesses
Problems in the design of the ECI have heavily burdened ECI campaigners in the process. These include legal constraints (such as liability issues over data protection and insufficient advice regarding the appropriate legal basis of ECIs), technical issues (the online collection system is not user-friendly and does not let campaigners access email addresses of signatories to keep them informed), and bureaucratic hurdles (each member state has different data requirements and signature forms).Very few citizens are aware that the ECI exists. Moreover, there is little guarantee that a successful ECI will have an actual impact on EU legislation, as the three first ‘successful’ ECIs have shown.
The review process will offer a reflection over the successes and failures of the ECI during its first three years. Many civil society organisations, ECI organisers and Members of the European Parliament are advocating for a major reform of the ECI regulation.[46][47]
The ECI Campaign, an organization exclusively working for the successful introduction and implementation of the European Citizens’ Initiative right, has proposed 12 concrete ways to make the ECI work. Those suggestions were the result of the publication entitled "An ECI That Works. Learning from the first two years of the European Citizens' Initiative."[48]
The ECI Support Centre, a joint initiative of Democracy International, the European Citizen Action Service und the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe, has developed an ‘App’ for Android smartphones, which informs users of the latest European Citizens’ Initiatives. The Centre recommends the EU Commission to develop an ECI-App, which should enable mobile signing and can help raise public awareness of the ECI.[49]
The on-line signature collection system
The ECI process allows organizers to also collect statements of support on-line. Even though some developers and organisations has announced the development of software tools,[50] so far only the EC has managed to developed a tool called OCS. The first versions of the software have been heavily criticized by some developers.[51][52] Some organisers has also criticized the security regulations regarding the ECI collection process and number of technical errors during the collection period.[53]
Reform process 2015-2016
According to the ECI Regulation 211/2011 every three years the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the Regulation. However, discussions on the ECI reform have started already in mid 2014, when the European Parliament presented a new ECI study entitled “European Citizens‘ Initiative – First lessons of implementation“. The analysis has been conducted at the request of the AFCO and PETI Committees, and tried to identify difficulties faced by organisers when setting up and running an ECI.[54]
In October 2014 Mr. Frans Timmermans became the newly elected Commissioner responsible for the ECI. During the question and answer session in the European Parliament he avoided giving any concrete answers regarding the use or reform of the ECI.[55] Few weeks later The ECI Campaign has organised a workshop “An ECI For the Next Generation” in which number of stakeholders and decisionmakers took part. Conclusions were clear - the ECI is at the crossroads and it needs reform.[56]
In December 2014 the European Citizen Action Service (ECAS) and the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) organised a conference entitled “ECI Legal Framework – Need for Reform?”. During the conference the findings and recommendations of a study recently undertaken by ECAS and the Law firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer on the legal basis of the refused ECIs were presented and discussed.[57] The overall conclusions of the Study are that the legal admissibility requirements are applied in a too narrow fashion by the Commission, that the decision to refuse registration has been arbitrary and that the reasons given for a rejection have been incomplete.
On 26 February 2015, the Constitutional Affairs (AFCO) and Petitions (PETI) committees of the European Parliament organised a public hearing on the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI). This marked the official start of debate on the review of the ECI Regulation. Despite security restrictions limiting attendance, the hearing attracted a standing-room only crowd. Present were key ECI stakeholders: the European Commission, Parliament and Council, EESC, civil society organisations and ECI organisers. The 3 ½ hours of discussion led all participants to one clear and unequivocal conclusion: the ECI needs reform.[58] Speaking at the hearing, Frans Timmermans, First Vice-President of the European Commission, admitted that the ECI has not worked well enough and took personal responsibility to improve it so that it does not disappear.[59]
In March 2015 the European Ombudsman, Emily O'Reilly, has made proposals to strengthen the role that ECI play in democratic political debate at the European level. The Ombudsman calls for better guidance for ECI organisers, a stronger involvement of the European Parliament and the Council and increased pressure on the Member States to make sure that all EU citizens can sign an ECI, regardless of where they reside. Emily O'Reilly explained in her statement: "The Commission has done a lot to give effect to the ECI right in a citizen-friendly way. However, more can be done to ensure that ECI organisers feel that their efforts to mobilise one million signatures are worthwhile and that political debate at the European level takes account of their initiatives, even if specific initiatives do not lead to new EU legislation. We need a more effective dialogue with ECI organisers at different stages of an initiative as well as more transparent decision-making as regards what action the Commission takes on ECIs."[60] The Ombudsman's full list of suggestions is available here.
On 31 March 2015 the Commission has adopted the Report on the application of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 on the citizens' initiative, which constitutes an important element of the potential ECI reform.[61]
On 13 April 2015 third edition of the "ECI Day" took place in the European Economic and Social Committee. The conference was entitled "Review, Renew, Reset!" and focused on the EC's and Ombudsman's reports.[62] During the event The ECI Campaign presented an open letter to European Commission First Vice President Frans Timmermans, signed by 21 ECI campaigns. It called on the Commission to propose a deep and meaningful amendment to the ECI’s Regulation 211/2011.[63]
In consequence of the above-mentioned conferences and reports Members of European Parliament (MEPs) on the Constitutional Affairs (AFCO) and Petitions (PETI) committees started to draft a report calling for a motion of the European Parliament on the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI). It asks the Commission to consider several ways to make the ECI both more impactful and easier to use. AFCO Rapporteur MEP György Schöpflin presented the draft ECI report for discussion in the 16 April 2015 AFCO committee meeting. During a lively 45 minute debate, many MEPs expressed their commitment to reform and strengthen the ECI. In consequence, after 2 months of in-depth analysis over 20 members of the AFCO committee came up with 127 amendments to the draft report. Additionally, PETI and JURI committees presented their own opinions on the ECI.[64][65]
On 16 June 2015, the Latvian Presidency of the Council of the EU, the Council General Secretariat and The ECI Campaign brought together stakeholders from EU institutions, Member States and civil society to reflect on the future of the ECI. This was the first ECI conference hosted in the premises of the EU Council. Stakeholders expressed deep concern that ECI use has declined dramatically since 2013 and that no ECI has led to a legislative proposal. All agreed that the ECI is unnecessarily complex. Participants noted that significant changes to ECI procedures are urgently needed if citizen confidence in the ECI is to be restored and it is to fulfil its promise of participatory democracy.[66]
To follow the reform process of the European Citizens' Initiative visit this website.
Differences from referendums
Citizen initiatives are democratic mechanisms that let citizens propose and vote on laws and policies. By gathering a certain number of signatures, citizens can demand a binding vote on a proposed policy or legislation. With the European Citizens’ Initiative, citizens can invite the Commission to look at the proposed policy or legislation; it is not obliged to act. Citizen initiatives differ from referendums in which citizens only can accept or reject a law or policy proposed by parliament. Also, it has been stated by the European Commission that an ECI can only be the subject of the acceptation/creation of a law, but it cannot ask to reject a law.[67]
See also
References
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Michael Efler: How the Convention got convinced, 27 June 2003, citizens-initiative.eu
- ↑ Michael Efler: A rollercoaster ride toward the ECI, 27 June 2003, democracy-international.org
- ↑ Green Paper on a European Citizens' Initiative. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0622:FIN:EN:PDF
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Regulation (EU) No. 211/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council 16 February 2011 on the citizens' initiative. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:065:0001:0022:EN:PDF
- ↑ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1179/2011 laying down technical specifications for online collection systems pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the citizens’ initiative. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:301:0003:0009:EN:PDF
- ↑ First European Citizens’ Initiative delivered to Commissioner Dalli. A million Europeans demand a moratorium on genetically modified crops. http://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/en/News/2010/first-citizens-initiative/
- ↑ https://twitter.com/#!/MarosSefcovic
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/content/20140204STO34708/html/Right-to-water-attend
- ↑ Communication from the Commission on the European Citizens' Initiative "Water and sanitation are a human right! Water is a public good, not a commodity!". http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2014/EN/1-2014-177-EN-F1-1.Pdf
- ↑ http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/roadmaps/docs/2015_env_041_drinking_water_en.pdf
- ↑ http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/content/20140407IPR42621/html/European-Parliament-hearing-on-“One-of-Us”-European-Citizens’-Initiative
- ↑ Communication from the Commission on the European Citizens' Initiative "One of Us". http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2014/EN/1-2014-355-EN-F1-1.Pdf
- ↑ http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/agri/events-citizint.html?id=20150424CHE00301
- ↑ http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/3/2015/EN/3-2015-3773-EN-F1-1.PDF
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ [1][dead link]
- ↑ endecocide.eu
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ "An ECI That Works! Learning from the first two years of the European Citizens' Initiative." / "My Voice against Nuclear Power". http://ecithatworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/116__AgainstNuclearPower.pdf
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Case T-754/14: Action brought on 10 November 2014 — Efler and Others v Commission. EUR-Lex.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ European Commission - "The procedure step by step". http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/how-it-works
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/how-it-works/committee
- ↑ http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/how-it-works/registration
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/how-it-works/certification
- ↑ http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/how-it-works/collection
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/how-it-works/verification
- ↑ http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/how-it-works/submission
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ http://ecithatworks.org
- ↑ http://www.ecas.org/civic-engagement/eci-support-centre/
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ "An ECI That Works. Learning from the first two years of the European Citizens' Initiative." - Interview with Xavier Dutoit. http://ecithatworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/AN-ECI-That-Works-Back-To-The-Drawing-Board.pdf
- ↑ "An ECI That Works. Learning from the first two years of the European Citizens' Initiative." - Reinder Rustema - "Why the ECI needs a Community-Developed Online Collection System". http://ecithatworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/209__CommunityDevelopedOCS.pdf
- ↑ "An ECI That Works. Learning from the first two years of the European Citizens' Initiative." http://ecithatworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/An_ECI_That_Works.pdf
- ↑ European Parliament, “European Citizens‘ Initiative – First lessons of implementation“. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/519240/IPOL_STU(2015)519240_EN.pdf
- ↑ The ECI Campaign. http://www.citizens-initiative.eu/commissioner-designate-frans-timmermans/
- ↑ The ECI Campaign. http://www.citizens-initiative.eu/workshop-on-european-citizens-initiative-shows-the-instrument-is-at-the-crossroads/
- ↑ ECAS - "The European Citizens' Initiative Registration: Falling at the First Hurdle? Analysis of the registration requirements and the "subject matters" of the rejected ECIs". http://www.ecas.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ECI-report_ECAS-2014_1.pdf
- ↑ The ECI Campaign. http://www.citizens-initiative.eu/ep-public-hearing/
- ↑ The ECI Campaign. http://www.citizens-initiative.eu/timmermans-personally-commits-to-the-eci-contitunation/
- ↑ http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/press/release.faces/en/59208/html.bookmark
- ↑ Report on the application of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 on the citizens' initiative. http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2015/EN/1-2015-145-EN-F1-1.PDF
- ↑ EESC, ECI Day 2015 General Report. http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/eci-day-2015-final-report.pdf
- ↑ The ECI Campaign. http://www.citizens-initiative.eu/letter-to-timmermans/
- ↑ Opinion of the Committee on Petitions for the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the European Citizens’ Initiative. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML%2bCOMPARL%2bPE-551.974%2b02%2bDOC%2bPDF%2bV0%2f%2fEN
- ↑ Opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs for the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the European Citizens’ Initiative. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML%2bCOMPARL%2bPE-557.231%2b02%2bDOC%2bPDF%2bV0%2f%2fEN
- ↑ The ECI Campaign. http://www.citizens-initiative.eu/eci-conference-in-council/
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
External links
- ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative – European Citizens' Initiative on the European Commission's website
- European Citizens' Initiative on the initiators' websites:
- citizens-initiative.eu (also: ecicampaign.org) – European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) on the The ECI Campaign web
- democracy-international.org/eci.html – European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) on the Democracy International web
- mehr-demokratie.de/eu-buergerinitiative.html – Europäische Bürgerinitiative on the Mehr Demokratie (More Democracy) web
- Further, other websites:
- clicknsign.eu – ClicknSign, "the first social platform dedicated to citizens' empowerment through the ECI"
- Websites of (some) European Citizens' Initiatives (in order of registration):
- ECI/s on citizens-initiative.eu (also: ecicampaign.org) one of the ECI initiators' websites:
- European Citizens’ Initiative – in that section: What is the ECI? / Open ECIs / Closed ECIs / Rejected ECIs / An overview of the first 2 years of the European Citizens’ Initiative
- ECIs on the Commission's website:
- Closed (finalised) initiatives:
- Collection closed – collection is closed, not (yet) submitted to the Commission
- Submitted to the Commission – reached the required number of signatures, Commission's answer pending.
- Answered by the Commission – Commission's conclusions already presented
- Obsolete initiatives:
- Withdrawn – withdrawn by the organisers
- Insufficient support – did not gather the required number of signatures within the 1-year time limit
- Refused initiatives:
- Refused requests for registration – did not comply with the conditions according to Art.4(2) of the Regulation on the ECI, with the negative Commission's replies
- Closed (finalised) initiatives: