Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States
From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
| Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
| Argued March 11, 1953 Decided May 24, 1953 |
|||||
| Full case name | Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States | ||||
| Citations | 345 U.S. 594 (more)
73 S.Ct. 872
|
||||
| Prior history | Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana | ||||
| Holding | |||||
| A publisher selling only combined insertions appearing in both its morning and evening papers does not violate the Sherman Act | |||||
| Court membership | |||||
|
|||||
| Case opinions | |||||
| Majority | Clark, joined by Vinson, Reed, Frankfurter, Jackson | ||||
| Dissent | Burton, joined by Black, Douglas, Minton | ||||
Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 594 (1953), is an antitrust law decision by the United States Supreme Court. In a 5–4 decision it held that a tie-in sale of morning and evening newspaper advertising space does not violate the Sherman Antitrust Act, because there was no market dominance in the tying product.[1]
See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 345
- Northern Pacific R. Co. v. United States (1958), a similar case
- Jefferson Parish Hospital Dist. No. 2 v. Hyde (1984), a case involving "tying arrangements"
- United States v. Loew's Inc. (1962), a case on product bundling
References
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
Further reading
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
<templatestyles src="Asbox/styles.css"></templatestyles>
|
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
