Vacation Village

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Vacation Village
Location Enterprise, Nevada
Address 6711 South Las Vegas Boulevard
Opening date November 9, 1990
Closing date January 8, 2002 (casino)
January 9, 2002 (hotel)
Theme Southwest[1]
Number of rooms 315
Total gaming space 15,000 sq ft (1,400 m2)
Notable restaurants Denny's[2]
Casino type Land-based
Renovated in 1999–2000
Coordinates Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Vacation Village was a hotel and casino located on 3 acres (1.2 ha) of land at 6711 South Las Vegas Boulevard, south of the Las Vegas Strip, in Enterprise, Nevada. It operated from 1990 to 2002.

The hotel-casino struggled through financial difficulties and various legal problems during its final years, and was eventually auctioned after failing to pay off a $19 million loan. Since 2007, the southeastern portion of the Town Square shopping center has occupied the former land of Vacation Village.

History

Early history

In 1964,[3] brothers Carol and Chuck Heers purchased 25 acres (10 ha) of land on Las Vegas Boulevard, south of Sunset Road,[4] with the intention to construct a hotel and casino.[3] In 1972, construction began on the Century Hotel.[5][6] By 1974, only a portion of the building had been completed.[3] Carol Heers gradually built the hotel and casino during subsequent years.[7] In 1988, the Heers planned to expand the un-opened property to include three seven-story hotel towers,[4] and five three-story towers.[8] Construction began in 1989.[3] Plans for the seven-story towers were derailed in 1990 due to new height restrictions after the nearby McCarran International Airport made the decision to expand its north runway.[4] Vacation Village was half-built at the time.[9] Plans for an 80-foot sign were also scrapped.[3]

Vacation Village opened on November 9, 1990,[10] on three acres of the 25-acre property.[11] In 1991, to maintain operations, the Heers family took a $10 million loan from Robert Hilt, a casino owner in Colorado.[2] In 1993, the Heers family lost the hotel-casino to bankruptcy.[4] By April 1997, an expansion was being planned that would have included the addition of a three-story hotel tower, adding 652 hotel rooms. The expansion also would have added additional square footage to the casino, as well as additional restaurants, rental space, a movie theater, a laundry building, and a three-story parking garage.[12] Carol Heers' company and the owner of Vacation Village, CEH Properties Limited, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in October 1997.[13]

Tim Heers, the son of Carol Heers, acquired Vacation Village in 1999, after previously leasing the property from his father's company.[13] Tim Heers became the president of Vacation Village,[14] as well as a major shareholder.[15] In 1999,[13] Vacation Village took a $19.4 million loan from Foothill Capital Corporation to pay off the earlier loan from Hilt.[2] Between October 1999 and November 2000, Vacation Village was expanded to include two bars, a liquor store, a bingo hall, a race book, and a wedding chapel. At that time, it was one of only five casinos on the Las Vegas Strip to offer bingo.[7]

Financial and legal problems

In October 2000, Foothill Capital sued Vacation Village Inc. and its affiliate, Shangri La Limited, as well as five general partners of Shangri La. Foothill Capital alleged that the two companies failed to repay the $19.4 million loan, which was secured by the hotel-casino and a shopping center owned by Shangri La. The loan was due on September 14, 2000. According to Foothill Capital, $19.35 million was due as of October 23, 2000.[16]

On November 17, 2000, Vacation Village filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. That month, Terri Heers Thompson, a shareholder in Vacation Village, said the hotel-casino intended to pay off the $19 million loan within 60 to 90 days. Thompson also said Vacation Village had received approval to become a Holiday Inn franchise hotel. The hotel-casino was to be renamed the Holiday Inn Las Vegas after new financing was obtained and the property had been upgraded to meet the hotel chain's standards. The hotel, which had 315 rooms at the time, had received approval from Clark County to build up to 700 additional rooms. A timeshare development, consisting initially of 60 units and retaining the Vacation Village name, was also planned at that time. The hotel-casino also planned to add a bowling alley and 200 slot machines.[9]

In December 2000, Tim Heers claimed that two mortgage brokers had reneged on a deal to pay off the loan, resulting in Vacation Village's financial problems: "Remington Financial of Phoenix and Financial Solutions of New York are two mortgage brokers that took us to Foothill a year ago, and got us the $19 million loan. Remington told us if we put up a $35,000 deposit through them to a potential lender called Mee Corp., we would get an extension on our $19 million loan and a new loan through Mee Corp. But they lied. They didn't come through with the new loan." Foothill denied the claims.[13]

In June 2001, Foothill Capital moved forward with plans to force a sale of the property and its gaming equipment in an auction, to recover its $19 million loan.[17] That month, Vacation Village received a $35 million loan from Bank of Canton of California. From the loan, $24 million was to be used to pay off money owed to Foothill Capital, while another $4 million was to be used to renovate the hotel to meet Holiday Inn requirements. The remaining $7 million was to be used to build a bowling center and 24 new guest suites.[18]

In July 2001, Foothill Capital sought court approval to appoint Eric Nelson Auctioneering to handle an auction of Vacation Village and its gaming equipment in the event that its owners fail to close the loan transaction.[18] Later that month, the $35 million loan became the center of a dispute when three brokers from Bank of Canton claimed they were owed a brokers' fee of $3.4 million.[18] The $35 million loan, stalled partly because of these accusations, was declined.[15] In August 2001, Tim Heers said the property was considering a $42 million loan from a new, unnamed potential lender.[15]

On September 4, 2001, Vacation Village alleged that Eric Nelson Auctioneering was not qualified to auction the hotel-casino, claiming it had a conflict of interest because it was a client of Gordon & Silver, a Las Vegas law firm that represented Foothill Capital. Vacation Village also accused the auctioneer's broker, Eric Nelson, of being a competitor to the hotel-casino because he was the president of two Las Vegas gaming companies at the time, neither of which were licensed in Nevada or owned any gaming property in the state. Nelson denied having a conflict of interest. On September 4, a U.S. Bankruptcy judge rejected Vacation Village's request to remove Nelson.[19]

Vacation Village also alleged that Nelson threatened to destroy the hotel-casino's business and its owners after he was told that it was trying to get a court ruling to remove him. Nelson denied these allegations,[19] which Vacation Village withdrew the following week.[14] At that time, several hotel owners, investors and gaming companies had become interested in the property because of its location and the potential to increase the hotel to 1,000 rooms.[19]

On September 13, 2001, Foothill Capital said during a court hearing that Vacation Village had failed to comply with a court order to sign an auction agreement for the sale of the property in November. Foothill Capital also said the hotel-casino failed to advance $50,000 for advertising costs to Eric Nelson Auctioneering, as well as failing to fully cooperate with the auctioneer's requests. An attorney for Vacation Village said the hotel-casino did not have money for advertising costs. However, various people related to the hotel-casino–including its owners, managing partners, and their family relatives–received what Foothill Capital referred to as "unauthorized" payments without court approval or explanation, totaling $70,000 to $80,000 per month.[14]

In October 2001, Vacation Village sued the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) over a dispute regarding ownership of a 15-acre parcel–located between Sunset Road and the hotel-casino–that was sold to NDOT for use in a public highway. According to Vacation Village, plans to use the land for an off-ramp were abandoned around 1994. The land was subsequently transferred to the Clark County Department of Aviation in July 2001. Laura Fitzsimmons, an attorney for Vacation Village, said that the hotel-casino should be entitled to part of the land: "We want the court to decide who has rights to that property. That's important to us because Vacation Village can't build upwards due to height restrictions imposed by Clark County. And when you can't build upwards, you've got to build outwards."[20]

Sale and closure

On November 20, 2001, Vacation Village was sold in an auction for $17.8 million to Capital One LLC, owned by Shawn Scott.[21] Scott had previously owned the Cheyenne hotel and casino, but relinquished his gaming license in 1997, after the Cheyenne was criticized for inadequate accounting practices. Scott had to rely on the Heers family to operate the casino.[22] Scott planned to keep Vacation Village open for the short term while developing a long term plan for the property. At the time of the sale, Leroy's Horse & Sports Place operated the southernmost sportsbook on the Las Vegas Strip, with the Mandalay Bay being the closest alternative.[21]

Vacation Village's 15,000 sq ft (1,400 m2) casino began closing on the evening of January 8, 2002, when its 10 table games and 700 slot machines were shut down. Gaming ended at the casino by 11:00 p.m., while 66 guests were ordered to vacate the hotel by noon on the following day. Approximately 350 employees were laid off.[22][23][24][25]

Prior to the closure, Scott and the Heers family were involved in a dispute regarding when Scott could take possession of the hotel-casino.[2] Jim Norcott, a member of the hotel-casino's board of directors, said it closed as a result of failed lease negotiations between Scott and the Heers family.[22] According to Norcott, Scott had agreed to let the Heers family lease the property on a month-to-month basis, but Scott's lawyer later told the family that Scott did not want to be involved. Norcott also claimed that Eric Nelson Auctioneering implied to the family that the hotel-casino would remain open until January 28, 2002. Scott denied Norcott's claims, saying he took possession of Vacation Village because a lease agreement could not be reached with the Heers; and because he felt the casino needed a stable gaming operator, citing the hotel-casino's recent problems.[2]

A major reason for the closure was because Scott was in talks with two local gaming operators about a possible joint venture to redevelop the property, possibly under a new name. Scott had plans to increase the property to approximately 1,500 hotel rooms, and to add several new restaurants and more than 1,500 slot machines, as well as a movie theater. Scott also mentioned the possibility of selling the property.[2]

By August 2002, the property had a prospective buyer who was to have a 10-year lease agreement with Holiday Inn, which planned to add approximately 700 additional hotel rooms to replace its rooms at the Boardwalk Hotel and Casino, which was no longer part of the hotel chain. Holiday Inn agreed to let Vacation Village use 60 of its new rooms as timeshares.[11][26] Other plans included an underground 118-lane bowling alley, which would be the largest in the world.[11] Horse racing or dog racing was also planned for a 70-acre vacant lot, owned by Howard Hughes Corporation and located north of Vacation Village.[11]

In January 2004, the closed hotel-casino was sold for $25.5 million to Centra Properties and Turnberry Associates, which expected to demolish Vacation Village by the end of the year to make room for a retail center.[27] Demolition was approved in November 2004.[28]

Film history

Vacation Village briefly appears in the 1995 film, Beyond Desire.[29] In September 1998, Univision's television music series Caliente filmed scenes at the hotel's pool.[30]

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.(subscription required)
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. 19.0 19.1 19.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. 21.0 21.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.(subscription required)
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links