Open Philanthropy Project

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. The Open Philanthropy Project (often abbreviated as Open Phil[1] and formerly GiveWell Labs) is a joint project between GiveWell (a charity evaluator focusing mostly on global health) and Good Ventures (a philanthropic organization co-founded by Cari Tuna and her husband Dustin Moskovitz, one of the co-founders of Facebook)[2] that tries to identify the most effective ways to give money to a wide variety of causes.[3][4] The project identifies important and neglected problems and tries to fund tractable approaches to solve those problems. The project conducts analysis and data collection.[5] As of 2016, it is still not entirely separate from GiveWell.[6]

History

The Open Philanthropy Project started out as GiveWell Labs in 2011 but made little progress until 2013.[7][8]

The name was changed to Open Philanthropy Project in August 2014[7] to separate it from GiveWell and also to avoid exclusive association to GiveWell since it is a collaboration with Good Ventures. However even after this initial brand change, updates to Open Phil were still posted to the GiveWell blog.[3]

In April 2015, Open Phil announced a partnership with Kaitlyn Trigger and Mike Krieger (co-founder of Instagram). Trigger and Krieger pledged $750,000 over two years while Open Phil would provide information and include Trigger in team meetings.[1][9][10]

In September 2015, Holden Karnofsky announced on the GiveWell blog that it would launch a separate website for Open Phil by the end of 2015.[11] By February 2016, updates to Open Phil were posted to the Open Phil blog rather than the GiveWell blog (as was previously done).[12]

As of March 2016, the Open Philanthropy Project is not an independent organization i.e. it is still a collaboration between GiveWell and Good Ventures, who share office space and information (to an extent). However Open Phil is in the process of becoming an independent organization.[13][14]

Organizational structure

Cari Tuna is the organization's president, Holden Karnofsky is the executive director, and Elie Hassenfeld is the managing director. Open Phil also has several program officers for various focus areas (such as US policy and scientific research), research analysts, and other roles.[15]

Evaluation process

Investigation for the Open Philanthropy Project is considered more difficult than the traditional work done for GiveWell due to the great uncertainty and inherent difficulty of comparing wildly different causes.[1]

Open Phil divides its work into lower-depth investigations (also called shallow overviews), higher-depth investigations (including focus areas), and cross-cutting projects.[16]

Open Phil also practices "giving to learn", i.e. a process of committing to causes to better learn about them.[16][17][18] Executive Director Holden Karnofksy has described Open Phil's approach as one of "hits-based giving", where they aim to have a portfolio of grants that maximizes the likelihood of a highly impactful grant.[19]

Shallow overviews

The Open Philanthropy Project publishes shallow overviews of general causes.[20] The first shallow overview appears to have been published in April 2013,[21] but GiveWell appears to have first officially announced shallow overviews in a blog post in May 2013.[16] As of September 2013, shallow investigations have been conducted in the areas of anthropogenic climate change, detection of near-Earth asteroids, migration (intra-country and international), volcanoes, geoengineering, nuclear security, business environment, infrastructure in sub-Saharan Africa, and the treatment of animals in industrial agriculture.[20] GiveWell co-executive director Holden Karnofsky discussed more about the purpose of shallow overviews in a conversation with Giving What We Can representatives and other effective altruists.[22]

Focus areas

The Open Philanthropy Project uses the term "cause" to describe a problem or opportunity that requires expertise in order to make good giving decisions. It uses the term "focus area" for causes with the highest level of priority.[23]

The following table lists the current (as of April 2016) focus areas for each broad category of investigation as well as program officers for each focus area or broad category.[15][23][24]

Category Focus areas Program officers
US Policy Criminal justice reform, farm animal welfare, macroeconomic stabilization policy, immigration policy, and land use reform Alexander Berger (US policy in general), Chloe Cockburn (criminal justice reform), Lewis Bollard (farm animal welfare)
Global Catastrophic Risks Biosecurity and potential risks from advanced artificial intelligence Howie Lempel, Daniel Dewey (potential risks from advanced artificial intelligence)
Scientific Research None Nick Beckstead
Global Health & Development None None

In a blog post in October 2015, Holden Karnofsky described reasons Open Phil isn't currently funding organizations that promote effective altruism.[25]

Farm animal welfare

Open Phil is focusing on farm animal welfare.[26] In September 2015, Holden Karnofsky announced that the Open Philanthropy Project had hired Lewis Bollard as a program officer to work on farm animal welfare in industrial agriculture.[27][28]

In February 2016, Open Phil announced grants of $1 million each to The Humane League and Mercy for Animals and $500,000 to The Humane Society of the United States for corporate cage-free campaigns.[29] Lewis Bollard, the program officer responsible for farm animal welfare, explained the rationale behind the grants in a blog post.[30] Animal Charity Evaluators stated that this grant completely or nearly completely filled The Humane League's immediate room for more funding, but that The Humane League could still grow in other areas that are not funded by the grant.[31]

Criminal justice reform

Open Phil is investigating criminal justice reform due to poor conditions in prisons and bipartisan agreement in the US. There are difficulties to this investigation because of lack of randomized controlled trials of interventions.[1]

In June 2015, Holden Karnofsky announced that Open Phil had hired Chloe Cockburn (who was Advocacy and Policy Counsel for American Civil Liberties Union's Campaign to End Mass Incarceration) as program officer for criminal justice reform.[32]

Discussing the decision to hire Cockburn as part of a larger overview of the Open Philanthropy Project, Sydney Martin, not affiliated with Open Phil, wrote: "Trying to organize the political will to take on something like reforming the US incarceration system was nearly impossible. Let alone trying to stand against those that have millions invested in keeping the prison industry alive and well. It always felt that these sorts of reforms was David vs. Goliath. But with a large sum of money, and a lot of thoughtful careful effort, change seems to have a tangible future."[4]

Land use reform

Open Phil published a public report on land use reform in March 2015. As of March 2016, there are no full-time staff working in this area. Alexander Berger leads the grantmaking.[33]

Macroeconomic stabilization policy

In May 2014, Open Phil published a medium-depth report on macroeconomic policy.[34] As of March 2016, there are no full-time staff working in this area. Alexander Berger leads the grantmaking.[35]

Immigration policy

Open Phil is investigating "labor mobility" or migration liberalization influenced by Michael Clemens and Lant Pritchett. This has mainly been because of potential wage increases for migrating workers (particularly low-skilled workers). Open Phil published a shallow overview of the cause in May 2013. By September 2013, labor mobility had become the subject of a "deep investigation".[18]

In March 2014, Open Phil awarded a grant of $1.2 million to the Center for Global Development. In July 2014, it awarded $1.5 million to the U.S. Association for International Migration and the International Organization for Migration, and $285,000 to ImmigrationWorks.[18]

Sebastian Nickel, writing in March 2015 and again in April 2016 for the pro-migration liberalization website Open Borders: The Case, evaluated Open Phil's work on migration liberalization favorably.[18][36]

Potential risks from advanced artificial intelligence

In August 2015, Open Phil contributed $1.2 million to the Future of Life Institute (FLI) in the same wave of grants in which Elon Musk participated. The grant came as many including Musk and Stephen Hawking publicly expressed the need for AI safety research.[37][38][39][40]

Biosecurity

Open Phil published a shallow investigation of biosecurity in January 2014, which covered natural pandemics, bioterrorism, and dual use research.[41]

Grants made

The Open Philanthropy Project has given grants to a variety of organizations, including the Future of Life Institute for research into potential dangers of artificial intelligence[39] and the Center for Global Development.[42][42]

The following table lists the grants made by Open Phil as of April 2016, grouped by focus area.[29]

Focus area Amount Recipients Percentage of total amount
Biosecurity $300,000 Blue Ribbon Study Panel on Biodefense 1%
Criminal Justice Reform $7,090,990 Alliance for Safety and Justice, Ayni Institute, Correctional Association of New York, FSU Project on Accountable Justice, Human Impact Partners, Institute of the Black World, JustLeadershipUSA, New York University, Pepperdine University, Pew Charitable Trusts, The Ordinary People Society, Vera Institute of Justice, Voice of the Ex-Offender, Washington Office on Latin America 26%
Farm Animal Welfare $2,500,000 Mercy For Animals, The Humane League, The Humane Society of the United States 9%
Global Catastrophic Risks $600,000 Future of Life Institute, Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative 2%
History of Philanthropy $77,000 ARNOVA, Center for Global Development, Rockefeller Archive Center 0.3%
Immigration Policy $4,050,220 Center for Global Development, ImmigrationWorks, ImmigrationWorks Foundation, New York University, Niskanen Center, Protect the People, U.S. Association for International Migration 15%
Land Use Reform $822,865 Seattle for Everyone, Sightline Institute, Smart Growth America, Urban Institute 3%
Macroeconomic Stabilization Policy $2,935,000 Center for American Progress, Center for Popular Democracy, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Peterson Institute for International Economics 11%
Other areas $3,100,000 Alliance for Open Society International, Brookings Institution, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Cochrane Collaboration, International Development Association, Population Services International, United States Cochrane Center, University of Pennsylvania 11%
Potential Risks from Advanced Artificial Intelligence $1,186,000 Future of Life Institute 4%
Scientific Research $599,112 Future of Research, Rescuing Biomedical Research 2%
U.S. Policy $4,053,000 Center for Global Development, Georgetown University, Pepperdine University, RAND Corporation, WaitList Zero 15%
Total amount granted $27,314,187 100%

The following is a summary of the grants based on year.

Year Total amount granted Recipients Percentage of total amount
2012 $1,100,000 Population Services International, United States Cochrane Center 4%
2013 $795,000 Center for Global Development, Pepperdine University, Washington Office on Latin America 3%
2014 $8,023,220 Alliance for Open Society International, Center for Global Development, Center for Popular Democracy, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Cochrane Collaboration, ImmigrationWorks Foundation, International Development Association, Pepperdine University, Pew Charitable Trusts, RAND Corporation, Rockefeller Archive Center, U.S. Association for International Migration, WaitList Zero 29%
2015 $6,841,855 ARNOVA, Blue Ribbon Study Panel on Biodefense, Brookings Institution, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Center for Popular Democracy, FSU Project on Accountable Justice, Future of Life Institute, Georgetown University, Human Impact Partners, ImmigrationWorks, JustLeadershipUSA, New York University, Niskanen Center, Sightline Institute, Smart Growth America, Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative, Urban Institute, WaitList Zero 25%
2016 $10,554,112 Alliance for Safety and Justice, Ayni Institute, Center for American Progress, Center for Global Development, Correctional Association of New York, Future of Life Institute, Future of Research, Institute of the Black World, Mercy For Animals, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Protect the People, Rescuing Biomedical Research, Seattle for Everyone, The Humane League, The Humane Society of the United States, The Ordinary People Society, University of Pennsylvania, Vera Institute of Justice, Voice of the Ex-Offender 39%
All years $27,314,187 100%

Criticisms

The Open Philanthropy Project has been criticized on The Huffington Post by Leah Hunt-Hendrix for not focusing enough on systemic (or root) change and for "perpetuating inequality".[43]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. ↑ 29.0 29.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. ↑ 39.0 39.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. ↑ 42.0 42.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

Retrieved from "https://infogalactic.com/w/index.php?title=Open_Philanthropy_Project&oldid=720455067"