Delta Air Lines Flight 89

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Delta Air Lines Flight 89
File:Delta Airlines B777-200LR - panoramio.jpg
N860DA, the Boeing 777 involved in the incident, pictured in 2013
Incident summary
Date January 14, 2020 (2020-01-14)
Summary Compressor stall, subsequent fuel jettison
Site South Los Angeles, California, United States
Passengers 149
Crew 16
Injuries (non-fatal) 0
Fatalities 0
Survivors 165
Aircraft type Boeing 777-200ER
Operator Delta Air Lines
Registration N860DA
Flight origin Los Angeles Int'l Airport
Destination Shanghai Pudong Int'l Airport

Delta Air Lines Flight 89 was a scheduled flight from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) to Shanghai Pudong International Airport. On January 14, 2020, the Boeing 777-200ER conducting the flight had engine problems shortly after takeoff; while returning to the origin airport for an emergency landing, it dumped fuel over populated areas adjacent to the city of Los Angeles, resulting in skin and lung irritation in at least 56 people on the ground and triggering a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) investigation. The aircraft landed safely with no injuries to passengers or crew.

Background

Flight 89 was a regularly scheduled Delta Air Lines flight from LAX to Shanghai Pudong International Airport. On January 14, 2020, the Boeing 777-200ER widebody jet aircraft operating as Flight 89 departed from LAX at 11:32am.[1][2] The aircraft had 149 passengers and 16 crew members on board.[3]

To reach Shanghai Pudong, the aircraft would be carrying enough fuel that it would exceed its certified maximum landing weight, increasing landing distance and risking structural damage if a landing is made without first dumping fuel; however, according to 777 pilot Les Abend, many runways at major airports can safely accommodate a landing by an overweight 777 in dry conditions.[4]

Incident

Minutes after departing LAX and initiating a climb over the Pacific Ocean, the pilots reported a compressor stall in the aircraft's right engine. Air traffic controllers asked Flight 89 whether the pilots wanted to remain over the ocean to dump fuel, but the pilots declined, saying "we've got it under control... we're not critical." Controllers again asked, "OK, so you don't need to hold or dump fuel or anything like that?", to which the pilots responded, "Negative."[5] The pilots requested Runway 25R, the longest runway at the airport.[4] Flight 89 turned back over land and headed toward LAX to make an emergency landing. CBS News reported that, based on the expert opinion of a former Boeing 777 captain, Flight 89 would likely have dumped 15,000-20,000 gallons of fuel.[3] Shortly after completing the fuel dump, the aircraft landed safely.[6]

While over land and approaching LAX for an emergency landing, the plane dumped fuel over a five-mile portion of the Los Angeles county area, including five elementary schools and a high school.[1] The most affected area was Park Avenue Elementary School in Cudahy, California, where several students were doused with jet fuel. Students at elementary schools in South Gate, California were also affected.[7] Children who were in a physical education class thought it was rain before seeing the plane above them.[8]

Aftermath

First responders were called to multiple schools to treat children and staff who were outdoors at the time Flight 89 dumped fuel. At least 56 children and adults were reported to have minor skin and lung irritations.[3] All affected schools were closed for cleaning, but reopened the following day.[5]

The story received widespread media attention, with detailed investigation and analysis from organizations including CBS News,[3] The New York Times,[1] the Los Angeles Times,[2] and received substantial international media coverage.[5][9][10] Aviation experts were puzzled by the actions of the flight crew. A former United Airlines captain called the fuel dump over a populated area "a pretty outrageous thing" that "nobody" would do. Safety expert John Cox said that because "they were not in an immediate threat condition, and they started out over water," the pilots will need to explain "why they continued to dump fuel at low altitude when they weren't in a fuel-dumping area, and didn't advise ATC that they were dumping fuel."[11] 777 pilot Les Abend noted that the pilots twice told controllers that they needed to delay the landing for unexplained reasons; this suggests that they needed more time to complete checklists and dump fuel, and did not feel compelled to land right away. However—trying to surmise why the pilots did not use the extra time to explain their intentions, nor to ask for vectors to a dumping area over the ocean—Abend stated "Honestly, I don't have the answer."[4]

Following the Flight 89 incident, the mayor of Burien, Washington, a city located adjacent to Seattle–Tacoma International Airport, called on the Port of Seattle to develop an emergency response plan for similar situations.[12]

The aircraft was put back into service with Delta on 10 days later on January 24.[13]

Investigation

On January 15, the FAA announced it was investigating the Flight 89 incident. In a statement, the FAA noted that "There are special fuel-dumping procedures for aircraft operating into and out of any major U.S. airport," and that "procedures call for fuel to be dumped over designated unpopulated areas, typically at higher altitudes so the fuel atomizes and disperses before it reaches the ground."[5]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.