Timeline of ceratosaur research
From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Skeletal mount of Ceratosaurus nasicornis
This timeline of ceratosaur research is a chronological listing of events in the history of paleontology focused on the ceratosaurs, a group of relatively primitive, often horned, predatory theropod dinosaurs that became the apex predators of the southern hemisphere during the Late Cretaceous. The nature and taxonomic composition of the Ceratosauria has been controversial since the group was first distinguished in the late 19th century.[1] In 1884 Othniel Charles Marsh described the new genus and species Ceratosaurus nasicornis from the Late Jurassic Morrison Formation of the western United States.[2] He felt that it belonged in a new family that he called the Ceratosauridae. He created the new taxon Ceratosauria to include both the Ceratosauridae and the ostrich-like ornithomimids.[3] The idea of the Ceratosauria was soon contested, however. Later that same decade both Lydekker and Marsh's hated rival Edward Drinker Cope argued that the taxon was invalid.[3]
The idea of the Ceratosauria would regain some support more than thirty years later when Gilmore argued in its favor in 1920. Nevertheless, the validity of Ceratosauria was disputed throughout much of the 20th century by researchers like Romer, Lapparent, Lavocat, Colbert, and Charig. However in 1986, more than a century after Marsh first coined the name, Jacques Gauthier revived the idea. Three years later, Rowe published a new definition of Ceratosauria, all taxa more closely related to Ceratosaurus than to birds, based on Gauthier's use of the term. This modern use of the term was thought to include the many theropods discovered since the 1880s known as coelophysoids.[3] Ceratosaurus itself had loose joints between bones in the skull whose interpretation has been controversial. Paleontologist Robert T. Bakker has interpreted this condition as an adaptation to swallow prey larger than it would otherwise be able to fit through its jaws.[4]
Since the 1980s, major developments in ceratosaur taxonomy have centered on the discovery of the Abelisauridae, a new family of large ceratosaurs that were among the dominant predators of the southern hemisphere during the Cretaceous.[5] One of the most notable of these was Carnotaurus, an unusual horned theropod with a short face.[4] More recent noteworthy non-abelisaur ceratosaur discoveries include the protruding-toothed noasaurid Masiakasaurus knopfleri, named after the lead guitarist from Dire Straits.[6]
Contents
19th century
- Othniel Charles Marsh described the new genus and species Ceratosaurus nasicornis.[2] He also erected the new family Ceratosauridae and named the Ceratosauria to include both Ceratosaurus and the Ornithomimidae.[3]
- Richard Lydekker rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]
- Cope rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]
- Charles Depéret described the new species Megalosaurus crenatissimus, based mostly on vertebrae.[7]
- Marsh described the new genus and species Labrosaurus sulcatus.[7]
20th century
1900s
File:Genyodectes.jpg
Illustration of the type specimen of Genyodectes serus
- Arthur Smith Woodward described the new genus and species Genyodectes serus.[7]
1910s
- Othenio Abel rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]
1920s
- Werner Janensch described the new genus and species Elaphrosaurus bambergi.[8]
- Charles Whitney Gilmore recognized the Ceratosauria and/or Ceratosauridae as valid.[3]
File:Sarcosaurus woodi.jpg
Type specimen of Sarcosaurus woodi
- Charles William Andrews described the new genus and species Sarcosaurus woodi.[7]
- Charles Alfred Matley described the new genus and species Lametasaurus indicus.[7]
- Janensch described the new species Ceratosaurus roechlingi. He also described the new species Labrosaurus stechowi.[7]
1930s
- Hem Chandra Das Gupta described the new genus and species Orthogoniosaurus matleyi.[7]
- Von Huene described the new genus and species Laevisuchus indicus.[9] He also described the new genus and species Coeluroides largus. He also described the new species Dryptosauruoides grandis. He also described the new genus and species Velocipes guerichi. He also described the new species Sarcosaurus andrewsi.[7] Huene recognized the Ceratosauria and/or Ceratosauridae as valid.[3]
- Von Huene and Matley described the new genus and species Indosaurus matleyi. They also described the new genus and species Indosuchus raptorius.[9] They also described the new genus and species Jubbulpuria tenuis. They also described the new genus and species Ornithomimoides barasimlensis. They also described the new species O. mobilis.[7]
- Alfred Sherwood Romer rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]
1950s
File:Majungasaurus.jpg
Neotype specimen of M. crenatissimus (MNHN.MAJ 1), the right dentary of a subadult individual, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris.
- René Lavocat erected the new genus Majungasaurus to house the species "Megalosaurus" crenatissimus, and designated a neotype specimen.[7]
- Albert-Félix de Lapparent and Lavocat rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]
- Romer rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]
- Von Huene recognized the Ceratosauria and/or Ceratosauridae as valid.[3]
1960s
- Romer rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]
1970s
- Rodney Steel rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]
File:Majungasaurus skull.jpg
The type specimen of "Majungatholus", a Majungasaurus snout bump originally mistaken for a pachycephalosaur skull dome
- Hans-Dieter Sues and Philippe Taquet described the new genus and species Majungatholus atopus.[9]
- Alan Jack Charig rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]
1980s
- José Bonaparte and Jaime Powell described the new genus and species Noasaurus leali.[9] They classified it in a new family, the Noasauridae.[3]
- Bonaparte and Fernando Emilio Novas described the new genus and species Abelisaurus comahuensis.[9]
- Bonaparte described the new genus and species Carnotaurus sastrei.[9]
- Robert T. Bakker thought the loose joints in the skull of Ceratosaurus was an adaptation allowing it to swallow prey that would otherwise be too large.[4]
- Ricardo Martínez and others described the new genus and species Xenotarsosaurus bonapartei.[9]
- Gauthier "resurrected the name Ceratosauria" to apply to the sister group of the tetanuran theropods. However, while he listed the members of his Ceratosauria, he did not propose a formal phylogenetic definition.[3]
- Rowe formally defined the Ceratosauria as theropods more closely related to Ceratosaurus nasicornis than birds, based on Gauthier's 1986 usage of the term.[3]
1990s
File:Velocisaurus.jpg
Artistic restoration of Velocisaurus unicus
- Rowe and Gauthier published a node-based definition of Ceratosauria.[3]
- Jean Le Loeuff and Eric Buffetaut described the new genus and species Tarascosaurus salluvicus.[7]
- Bonaparte described the new genus and species Velocisaurus unicus.[9]
- Novas regarded the Ceratosauria as consisting of two sister groups, the Coelophysoidea and their sister group, the Neoceratosauria.[3]
- Thomas Holtz named the Coelophysoidea, then thought to be ceratosaurs. He defined them as all theropods more closely related to Coelophysis than to Ceratosaurus. Holtz defined the Neoceratosauria as all theropods closer to Ceratosaurus than to Coelophysis. He also defined the ceratosaur subclade Abelisauroidea as all theropods closer to Carnotaurus sastrei than to Ceratosaurus nasicornis.[3]
- Hugues Accarie and others described the new genus and species Genusaurus sisteronis.[9]
- Bonaparte described the new genus and species Ligabueino andesi.[7]
- Sankar Chatterjee and Dhiraj Kumar Rudra observed that abelisaur teeth had lower crowns than other carnivorous dinosaurs either within or outside of Ceratosauria.[4]
- Coria and Leonardo Salgado described the new genus and species Ilokelesia aguagrandensis.[9]
- Sereno redefined Ceratosauria as all neotheropods closer to Coelophysis bauri than to birds. However, this definition never received broad acceptance by the scientific community because the Rowe had already defined the group in 1989, and therefore had priority.[3] He also split the Abelisauridae into two subfamilies; the Abelisaurinae (all abelisaurids more closely related to Abelisaurus than to Carnotaurus) and Carnotaurinae (all abelisaurids more closely related to Carnotaurus than to Abelisaurus).[3]
- Sampson and others described a more complete specimen of Majungatholus atops. They performed an X-ray CT scan of the skull of Majungatholus atopus. They found that the dome on the animal's skull formed of its frontal bone was actually hollow. This suggests that this structure was purely for display rather than used in fights between Majungatholus.[4]
21st century
2000s
Restored skull of Masiakosaurus knopfleri
- Madsen and Welles described the new species Ceratosaurus dentisulcatus and C. magnicornis.[9]
- Sampson, Carrano, and Forster described the new genus and species Masiakasaurus knopfleri.[9] They noted that at least six individuals were preserved together. This makes Masiakasaurus the first neoceratosaur to be preserved in association with others of its species.[10]
Skeletal mount of Aucasaurus garridoi
- Coria, Chiappe, and Dingus described the new genus and species Aucasaurus garridoi.[9]
- Kellner and Campos described the new genus and species Pycnonemosaurus nevesi.[11]
- Wilson and others described the new genus and species Rajasaurus narmadensis.[12]
- Calvo, Rubilar-Rogers and Moreno described the new genus and species Ekrixinatosaurus novasi.[13]
- P. C. Sereno, J. A. Wilson, and J. L. Conrad described the new genus and species Rugops primus as well as the new genus Spinostropheus.[14]
- Malkani described the new genus and species Vitakridrinda sulaimani.[15]
File:Limusaurus BW.jpg
Artistic restoration of Limusaurus inextricabilis
- Allain and others described the new genus and species Berberosaurus liassicus.[16]
- Sereno and Brusatte described the new genus and species Kryptops palaios.[17]
- Xu and others described the new genus and species Limusaurus inextricabilis.[18]
- Canale and others described the new genus and species Skorpiovenator bustingorryi.[19]
2010s
File:Eoabelisaurus restoration.png
Artistic restoration of Eoabelisaurus
- M. D. Ezcurra, F. L. Agnolin, and Novas described the new genus and species Austrocheirus isasii.[20]
- Novas and others described the new genus and species Rahiolisaurus gujaratensis.[21]
- Pol and Rauhut described the new genus and species Eoabelisaurus mefi.[22]
File:Arcovenator.jpg
Artistic restoration of Arcovenator
- Farke and Sertich described the new genus and species Dahalokely tokana.[23]
- Tortosa and others described the new genus and species Arcovenator escotae.[24]
- Sánchez-Hernández and Benton described the new genus and species Camarillasaurus cirugedae.[25]
- Sebastian G. Dalman described the new genus and species Fosterovenator.[26]
- Filippi and others described the new genus and species Viavenator exxoni.[27]
See also
Footnotes
- ↑ Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Introduction", page 47. Also cf. "Systematics and Evolution", page 64.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Table 3.1: Ceratosauria", pages 48–49.
- ↑ 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.20 3.21 3.22 3.23 3.24 Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Systematics and Evolution", page 64.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Paleobiology", page 69.
- ↑ Holtz (1999); "South American Discoveries: Keys to Dinosaur Evolution", pages 48–49.
- ↑ Sampson (2009); For description and naming, see "Dramatis Dinosaurae", pages 36–37. For family membership, see "Drifting Continents and Globe-Trotting Dinosaurs" page 59.
- ↑ 7.00 7.01 7.02 7.03 7.04 7.05 7.06 7.07 7.08 7.09 7.10 7.11 Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Table 3.1: Ceratosauria", page 50.
- ↑ Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Table 3.1: Ceratosauria", page 48.
- ↑ 9.00 9.01 9.02 9.03 9.04 9.05 9.06 9.07 9.08 9.09 9.10 9.11 9.12 Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Table 3.1: Ceratosauria", page 49.
- ↑ Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Paleobiology", page 70.
- ↑ Kellner and Campos (2002); "Abstract", page 163.
- ↑ Wilson et al. (2003); "Abstract", page 1.
- ↑ Calvo, Rubilar-Rogers and Moreno (2004); "Abstract", page 555.
- ↑ Sereno, Wilson, and Conrad (2004); "Abstract", page 1325.
- ↑ Malkani (2006); "Abstract", page 108.
- ↑ Allain et al. (2007); "Abstract", page 610.
- ↑ Sereno and Brusatte (2008); "Abstract", page 15.
- ↑ Xu et al. (2009); "Abstract", page 940.
- ↑ Canale et al. (2009); "Abstract", page 409.
- ↑ Ezcurra, Agnolin, and Novas (2010); "Abstract", page 1.
- ↑ Novas et al. (2010); "Abstract", page 45.
- ↑ Pol and Rauhut (2012); "Abstract", page 3170.
- ↑ Farke and Sertich (2013); "Abstract", page 1.
- ↑ Tortosa et al. (2013); "Abstract", page 63.
- ↑ Sánchez-Hernández and Benton (2014); "Abstract", page 581.
- ↑ Dalman (2014); "Abstract", page 181.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
References
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Canale, J.I., Scanferla, C.A., Agnolin, F., and Novas, F.E. (2008). "New carnivorous dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of NW Patagonia and the evolution of abelisaurid theropods." Naturwissenschaften. doi:10.1007/s00114-008-0487-4.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Kellner, A.W.A. and D.A. Campos. 2002. On a theropod dinosaur (Abelisauria) from the continental Cretaceous of Brazil. Arquivos do Museu Nacional Rio de Janeiro 60 (3): pp. 163–170.
- Malkani, 2006a. Biodiversity of saurischian dinosaurs from the Latest Cretaceous park of Pakistan. Journal of Applied and Emerging Sciences. 1(3), 108–140.
- Novas, Fernando E., Chatterjee, Sankar, Rudra, Dhiraj K., Datta, P.M. (2010). "Rahiolisaurus gujaratensis, n. gen. n. sp., A New Abelisaurid Theropod from the Late Cretaceous of India" in: Saswati Bandyopadhyay (ed.): New Aspects of Mesozoic Biodiversity. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. pp. 45–62. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10311-7. ISBN 978-3-642-10310-0.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Sereno, P.C., J.A. Wilson, and J.L. Conrad. 2004. New dinosaurs link southern landmasses in the Mid-Cretaceous. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) published online: pages 1–6.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Tykoski, R.S. & Rowe, T. (2004). "Ceratosauria". In: Weishampel, D.B., Dodson, P., & Osmolska, H. (Eds.) The Dinosauria (2nd edition). Berkeley: University of California Press. Pp. 47–70 ISBN 0-520-24209-2
- Wilson, J.A., Sereno, P.C., Srivastava, S., Bhatt, D.K., Khosla, A. and Sahni, A. (2003). "A new abelisaurid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Lameta Formation (Cretaceous, Maastrichtian) of India." (PDF) Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology [University of Michigan], 31(1): 1–42.
- Xu, X., Clark, J.M., Mo, J., Choiniere, J., Forster, C.A., Erickson, G.M., Hone, D.W.E., Sullivan, C., Eberth, D.A., Nesbitt, S., Zhao, Q., Hernandez, R., Jia, C.-K., Han, F.-L., and Guo, Y. (2009). "A Jurassic ceratosaur from China helps clarify avian digital homologies." Nature, 459(18): 940–944. doi:10.1038/nature08124
External links
Media related to Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. at Wikimedia Commons
