United States House of Representatives elections, 1902

United States House of Representatives elections, 1902
All 386 seats to the United States House of Representatives; 194 seats were needed for a majority
Speaker before election; David Henderson; Republican	Elected Speaker; Joseph Cannon; Republican

Elections to the United States House of Representatives in 1902 occurred in the middle of President Theodore Roosevelt's first term, about a year after the assassination of President William McKinley in September 1901.

Due to the increased size of the House and the reapportionment that resulted from the 1900 U.S. Census, both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party gained seats simultaneously, which has not occurred in any future elections to date. The Democrats increased their share of the House, but not by enough to regain control. With a stable economy and no cornerstone issue, Democratic gains can mostly be linked to the effects of redistricting. Many of the new seats were in areas that featured a high number of immigrants, either Eastern and Southern European industrial workers or Northern European farmers. New immigrant groups trended Democratic. The Populist Party disappeared from the House, with its supporters almost unanimously switching to the Democratic Party.^{[citation needed]} Notable freshmen included future Vice President and Speaker John Nance Garner (D-Texas).

This election marked the third and most recent time in American history where the incumbent President's party gained House seats in a midterm election while still losing seats in the Senate, the first two being in 1814 and 1822.

Election summaries

29 new seats were added in reapportionment following the 1900 Census.^[3] No states lost seats, 16 had no change in apportionment, 14 gained 1 seat, 3 gained 2 seats, and 3 gained 3 seats. Two of the states that gained representation elected the new seat at-large.

↓
207	3	176
Republican	IR	Democratic

State	Type	Total seats		Republican		Democratic
State	Type	Seats	Change	Seats	Change	Seats	Change
Alabama	District	9		0		9
Arkansas	District	7	1	0		7	1
California	District	8	1	5	2	3	3
Colorado	District +at-large^{[Note 4]}	3^{[Note 5]}	1	3	2^{[Note 6]}	0
Connecticut	District +at-large^{[Note 4]}	5	1	5	1	0
Delaware	At-large	1		0	1	1	1
Florida	District	3	1	0		3	1
Georgia	District	11		0		11
Idaho	At-large	1^{[Note 5]}		1	1	0
Illinois	District	25	3	17	6	8	3
Indiana	District	13		9		4
Iowa	District	11		10	1	1	1
Kansas	District +at-large	8		8	1	0	1
Kentucky	District	11		1	1	10	1
Louisiana	District	7	1	0		7	1
Maine^{[Note 7]}	District	4		4		0
Maryland	District	6		4	2	2	2
Massachusetts	District	14	1	10		4	1
Michigan	District	12		11	1	1	1
Minnesota	District	9	2	8	1	1	1
Mississippi	District	8	1	0		8	1
Missouri	District	16	1	1	2	15	3
Montana	At-large	1^{[Note 5]}		1	1	0
Nebraska	District	6^{[Note 8]}		5	3	1	1
Nevada	At-large	1		0		1
New Hampshire	District	2		2		0
New Jersey	District	10	2	7	1	3	1
New York	District	37	3	20	1	17	4
North Carolina	District	10	1	0	2	10	3
North Dakota	District^{[Note 9]}	2	1	2	1	0
Ohio	District	21		17		4
Oregon^{[Note 7]}	District	2		2		0
Pennsylvania	District^{[Note 10]}	32	2	29^{[Note 3]}	3	3	1
Rhode Island	District	2		1	1	1	1
South Carolina	District	7		0		7
South Dakota	At-large	2		2		0
Tennessee	District	10		2		8
Texas	District	16	3	0		16	3
Utah	At-large	1		1		0
Vermont^{[Note 7]}	District	2		2		0
Virginia	District	10		1	1	9	1
Washington	At-large	3	1	3	1	0
West Virginia	District	5	1	5	1	0
Wisconsin	District	11	1	10		1	1
Wyoming	At-large	1		1		0
Total		386	29	210^{[Note 3]} 54.4%	9	176 45.6%	25

House seats

Republican			54.40%
Democratic			45.60%

The previous election had 5 Populists, but the party completely disappeared from the U.S. House in the 1902 elections.

House seats by party holding plurality in state
80.1-100% Democratic	80.1-100% Republican
60.1-80% Democratic	60.1-80% Republican
Up to 60% Democratic	Up to 60% Republican

Net gain in party representation
6+ Democratic gain	6+ Republican gain
3-5 Democratic gain	3-5 Republican gain
1-2 Democratic gain	1-2 Republican gain
no net change

Early election dates

In 1902, three states, with 8 seats among them, held elections early:

June 2 Oregon
September 2 Vermont
September 8 Maine

Complete returns

Party abbreviations:

California

District	Incumbent	Party	First elected	Result	Candidates
California 1	Samuel D. Woods Redistricted from the 2nd district	Republican	1900	Retired Republican hold	James N. Gillett (R) 50.5% Thomas S. Ford (D) 46.7% M. E. Shore (S) 1.9% W. O. Clark (Pr) 0.9%
California 2	Frank Coombs Redistricted from the 1st district	Republican	1900	Lost re-election Democratic gain	Theodore A. Bell (D) 49.2% Frank Coombs (R) 48.3% G. H. Rogers (S) 1.7% W. P. Fassett (Pr) 0.8%
California 3	Victor H. Metcalf	Republican	1898	Re-elected	Victor H. Metcalf (R) 66.2% Calvin B. White (D) 27.7% M. W. Wilkins (S) 5% T. H. Montgomery (Pr) 1.1%
California 4	Julius Kahn	Republican	1898	Lost re-election Democratic gain	Edward J. Livernash (D) 49.2% Julius Kahn (R) 48.7% William Costley (S) 1.9% Joseph Rowell (Pr) 0.2%
California 5	Eugene F. Loud	Republican	1890	Lost re-election Democratic gain	William J. Wynn (D) 56.5% Eugene F. Loud (R) 41.2% Joseph Lawrence (S) 1.5% Frank W. Caton (Pr) 0.7%
California 6	James C. Needham Redistricted from the 7th district	Republican	1898	Re-elected	James C. Needham (R) 53.5% Gaston N. Ashe (D) 42.5% J. L. Cobb (S) 2.5% L. C. Jolley (Pr) 1.4%
California 7	James McLachlan Redistricted from the 6th district	Republican	1900	Re-elected	James McLachlan (R) 64.8% Carl A. Johnson (D) 27% George H. Hewes (S) 4.2% Frederick F. Wheeler (Pr) 4%
California 8	None (District created)			New district Republican gain	Milton J. Daniels (R) 51.9% William E. Smythe (D) 40.8% Noble A. Richardson (S) 5.4% Ellsworth Leonardson (Pr) 2%

Florida

District	Incumbent	Party	First elected	Result	Candidates
Florida 1	Stephen M. Sparkman	Democratic	1894	Re-elected	Stephen M. Sparkman (D) 100%
Florida 2	Robert Wyche Davis	Democratic	1896	Re-elected	Robert Wyche Davis (D) 100%
Florida 3	None (District created)			Democratic win	William B. Lamar (D) 100%

South Carolina

District	Incumbent	Party	First elected	Result	Candidates
South Carolina 1	William Elliott	Democratic	1886 1896	Retired to run for the Senate Democratic hold	George Swinton Legaré (D) 95.5% Aaron P. Prioleau (R) 4.5%
South Carolina 2	W. Jasper Talbert	Democratic	1892	Retired to run for Governor Democratic hold	George W. Croft (D) 94.9% W. S. Dixon (R) 5.0% Others 0.1%
South Carolina 3	Asbury Latimer	Democratic	1892	Retired to run for the Senate Democratic hold	Wyatt Aiken (D) 98.9% John Scott (R) 1.1%
South Carolina 4	Joseph T. Johnson	Democratic	1900	Re-elected	Joseph T. Johnson (D) 98.7% L. W. C. Blalock (R) 1.3%
South Carolina 5	David E. Finley	Democratic	1898	Re-elected	David E. Finley (D) 99.3% C. P. T. White (R) 0.7%
South Carolina 6	Robert B. Scarborough	Democratic	1900	Re-elected	Robert B. Scarborough (D) 100%
South Carolina 7	Asbury F. Lever	Democratic	1901 (special)	Re-elected	Asbury F. Lever (D) 96.2% Alexander D. Dantzler (R) 3.8%

Notes

↑ Three states held early elections between June 2 and September 18.
↑ Included 1 member of the Silver Republican faction, John F. Shafroth, of CO-01.
↑ ^3.0 ^3.1 ^3.2 Includes 3 Independent Republicans elected to PA-29, PA-31, and PA-32 in the Pittsburgh area.
↑ ^4.0 ^4.1 Additional seat elected at-large due to State delaying redistricting.
↑ ^5.0 ^5.1 ^5.2 Election of 1900 saw the election of 1 Populist.
↑ There was one member of the Silver Republican Party faction elected in 1900, John F. Shafroth. Shafroth attempted to get elected as a Democrat in 1902, but his election was contested and overturned.
↑ ^7.0 ^7.1 ^7.2 Elections held early.
↑ Election of 1900 saw the election of 2 Populists in Nebraska.
↑ Changed from at-large.
↑ At-large seats eliminated in redistricting.

References

↑ ^1.0 ^1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
↑ ^2.0 ^2.1 Martis, pp. 156–157.
↑ Apportionment Act of 1901

Bibliography

Republican Congressional Committee, The Republican Campaign Textbook 1902 (1902).
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

Office of the Historian (Office of Art & Archives, Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)

[1] Three states held early elections between June 2 and September 18.

[Reps-1900-2] Included 1 member of the Silver Republican faction, John F. Shafroth, of CO-01.

[3IR-5] 3.0 ^3.1 ^3.2 Includes 3 Independent Republicans elected to PA-29, PA-31, and PA-32 in the Pittsburgh area.

[als-7] 4.0 ^4.1 Additional seat elected at-large due to State delaying redistricting.

[1p-8] 5.0 ^5.1 ^5.2 Election of 1900 saw the election of 1 Populist.

[CO-1900-9] There was one member of the Silver Republican Party faction elected in 1900, John F. Shafroth. Shafroth attempted to get elected as a Democrat in 1902, but his election was contested and overturned.

[early-10] 7.0 ^7.1 ^7.2 Elections held early.

[11] Election of 1900 saw the election of 2 Populists in Nebraska.

[ald-12] Changed from at-large.

[als2-13] At-large seats eliminated in redistricting.

[USH-PartyDiv-3] 1.0 ^1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

[Martis-4] 2.0 ^2.1 Martis, pp. 156–157.

[6] Apportionment Act of 1901

[Note 1]

[Note 2]

[1]

[2]

[Note 3]

[3]

[Note 4]

[Note 5]

[Note 6]

[Note 7]

[Note 8]

[Note 9]

[Note 10]

United States House of Representatives elections, 1902

Contents

Election summaries

Early election dates

Complete returns

California

Florida

South Carolina

See also

Notes

References

Bibliography

External links

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation

Tools