1863 Goldfields South colonial by-election

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

A by-election was held for the New South Wales Legislative Assembly electorate of Goldfields South on 16 November 1863 because Bowie Wilson had been appointed Secretary for Lands in the first Martin ministry.[1] Such ministerial by-elections were usually uncontested and on this occasion, Peter Faucett (Yass), William Forster (East Sydney) and Arthur Holroyd (Parramatta) were unopposed. Of the other two contested elections, Geoffrey Eagar (West Sydney) was easily re-elected, with more than 90% of the vote, while James Martin was defeated at the Orange by-election.[2] Martin promptly regained a seat in parliament by winning the by-election for The Tumut.[2]

Frederick Cooper had been elected for Braidwood at the 1859 election, resigning in 1860,[3] to accept an appointment as a sub-commissioner of goldfields.[4] He was initially at Kiandra, however an inquiry had found he had committed errors, including illegal acts, as a result of his inexperience. Wilson, as member for Goldfields South, had been critical of the response of the then Secretary for Lands, John Robertson, in moving Cooper to Araluen rather than dismissing him.[5] Cooper resigned as sub-commissioner shortly after Wilson had been appointed Secretary for Lands.[6]

Dates

Date Event
16 October 1863 Bowie Wilson appointed Secretary for Lands.[1]
22 October 1863 Writ of election issued by the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly.[7]
5 November 1863 Nominations at Adelong.[6]
16 November 1863 Polling day
26 November 1863 Return of writ

Polling places

Result

1863 Goldfields South by-election
Monday 16 November[8][9]
Candidate Votes %
Bowie Wilson (elected) 921 91.3%
Frederick Cooper 88 8.7%
Total formal votes 1,009 100.0
Informal votes 0 0.0
Turnout 1,009 17.1

Returns were only reported for 8 of the 14 polling places.[8][9]

See also

Notes

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.