1891 Canterbury colonial election re-count

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

In September 1891 the Elections and Qualifications Committee conducted a re-count of the 1891 Canterbury election. There were 4 seats available. Joseph Carruthers (Free Trade) had been comfortably re-elected at the head of the poll with 7,231 votes, 19.8%. The following 4 candidates were separated by 105 votes, with John Wheeler (Free Trade) defeating James Eve (Ind. Free Trade) for the final seat with a margin of 5 votes. The next best candidate, John Grant (Labor) was a further 487 behind, with 3,857 votes, 10.6%.[1]

The committee declared that John Wheeler (Free Trade) had not been elected the member for Canterbury, however no by-election was conducted. Instead the committee declared that James Eve (Ind. Free Trade) based on its own count of the result.[1][2]

Dates

Date Event
17 June  1891 1891 Canterbury election
24 June 1891 Petition lodged by James Eve.[3]
14 July 1891 John Wheeler sworn in as member for Canterbury
16 July 1891 Elections and Qualifications Committee appointed.[2]
29 July 1864 Petition referred to the Elections and Qualifications Committee.[2]
2 September 1891 Elections and Qualifications Committee declared that James Eve had been elected.[2]

Result

1891 Canterbury election re-count
Wednesday 2 September[1]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
free trade Joseph Carruthers (re-elected 1) N/A
Labour NSW Thomas Bavister (elected 2) 4,453 12.19 +0.01
Labour NSW Cornelius Danahey (elected 3) 4,363 11.99 +0.03
independent free trade James Eve (elected 4) 4,349 11.92 +0.02
free trade John Wheeler (defeated) 4,344 11.90 -0.02
Total formal votes 36,491 99.30 -0.02
Informal votes 258[lower-alpha 1] 0.70 +0.02
Turnout 10,279 54.96 [lower-alpha 2] 
  Ind. Free Trade gain 1 from Free Trade

See also

Notes

  1. Calculated on the assumption that the total number of votes did not change.
  2. Change is compared to the previously declared count for the election.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.