Antibacterial soap
Antibacterial soap is any cleaning product to which active antimicrobial ingredients have been added.[citation needed] These chemicals kill bacteria and microbes[which?], but are no more effective at deactivating viruses than any other kind of soap or detergent, and they also kill nonpathogenic bacteria.[1][better source needed] According to the FDA, there is no evidence that antibacterial products are more effective than soap and water, and products which contain triclosan do not show that they reduce the transmission of respiratory or gastrointestinal infections.[2]
Definition
Antibacterial soap is any cleaning product to which active antimicrobial ingredients have been added to the product.
Ingredients
Most liquid hand and body soaps contain antibacterial chemicals.[citation needed] These are only contained at preservative levels unless the product is marked antibacterial, antiseptic, or germicidal.[citation needed] Triclosan, triclocarban, and chloroxylenol are commonly used for antibacterial and deodorant effect in consumer products.[citation needed] Some soaps contain tetrasodium EDTA which is a chelating agent that sequesters metals that the bacteria require in order to grow.[citation needed] Other microbes also require metals and so it is actually an anti-microbial agent that is widely used even as a preservative.[citation needed]
Research
Recent research from the Mo Bio Laboratories in California suggests that antibacterial hand soaps have no effect on deactivating viruses.[relevant? ] The study states "water alone was very effective so perhaps the water following soap helped to solubilize more virus. However, water alone with rubbing has the best reduction in virus and the rubbing with soap followed by water does not have an additive effect." Furthermore, ethanol-based solutions such as general hand sanitizers have no effect on viruses.
Studies have examined the purported benefits of antibacterial soap without clear consensus about the results. Some studies have concluded that simply washing thoroughly with plain soap is sufficient to reduce bacteria and, further, is effective against viruses. Other studies have found that soaps containing antimicrobial active ingredients remove more bacteria than simply washing with plain soap and water.[3][4] The U.S. Food and Drug Administration published reports that question the use of antibacterial soap and hand sanitizers saying that it found no medical studies that showed a link between a specific consumer antibacterial product and a decline in infection rates.[5]
At one conference, Stuart Levy, a microbiologist at Tufts University, cites these studies to compare antibacterial action with antibiotic resistance: "Dousing everything we touch with antibacterial soaps and taking antibiotic medications at the first sign of a cold can upset the natural balance of microorganisms in and around us, leaving behind only the 'superbugs'."1 See Triclosan#Resistance concerns
It has since been shown that the laboratory method used by Levy was not effective in predicting bacterial resistance for biocides like triclosan.[6] At least seven peer-reviewed and published studies have been conducted demonstrating that triclosan is not significantly associated with bacterial resistance over the short term, including one study coauthored by Levy.[7]
Recent research from Levy's lab concludes that "The results from our study do not implicate the use of antibacterial cleaning and hygiene products as an influential factor in carriage of antimicrobial drug-resistant bacteria on the hands of household members."[8] However, a more recent literature review performed by Levy concluded that "The lack of an additional health benefit associated with the use of triclosan-containing consumer soaps over regular soap, coupled with laboratory data demonstrating a potential risk of selecting for drug resistance, warrants further evaluation by governmental regulators regarding antibacterial product claims and advertising."[9] The paper's authors called for continued research in this area.
See also
![]() |
References
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ FDA questions use of antibacterial soaps (Tuesday, October 18, 2005) By Jane Zhang, The Wall Street Journal
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Aiello AE, Marshall B, Levy SB, Della-Latta P, Lin SX, Larson E. (2005), Antibacterial cleaning products and drug resistance. Emerg Infect Dis., Oct;11(10):1565-70
- ↑ Aiello AE, Larson EL, Levy SB. (2007), Consumer antibacterial soaps: effective or just risky? Clin Infect Dis., Sep 1;45 Suppl 2:S137-47
External links
- Articles with unsourced statements from March 2015
- All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases
- Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from March 2015
- Articles lacking reliable references from March 2015
- Articles with unsourced statements from March 2013
- Articles with unsourced statements from September 2015
- Wikipedia articles that may have off-topic sections
- Soaps
- Bacteria