Bowling Alone
Author | Robert D. Putnam |
---|---|
Country | United States |
Language | English |
Genre | Lua error in Module:Wikidata at line 247: invalid escape sequence near '"^'. |
Publication date
|
Lua error in Module:Wikidata at line 247: invalid escape sequence near '"^'. |
Media type | Print (hardback and paperback) |
Pages | Lua error in Module:Wikidata at line 247: invalid escape sequence near '"^'. |
ISBN | 0-7432-0304-6 |
Lua error in Module:Wikidata at line 247: invalid escape sequence near '"^'. | |
LC Class | Lua error in Module:Wikidata at line 247: invalid escape sequence near '"^'. |
Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community is a 2000 nonfiction book by Robert D. Putnam. It was developed from his 1995 essay entitled Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Putnam surveys the decline of social capital in the United States since 1950. He has described the reduction in all the forms of in-person social intercourse upon which Americans used to found, educate, and enrich the fabric of their social lives. He argues that this undermines the active civil engagement which a strong democracy requires from its citizens.
Contents
Putnam discusses ways in which Americans have disengaged from political involvement including decreased voter turnout, public meeting attendance, serving on committees and working with political parties. Putnam also cites Americans' growing distrust in their government. Putnam accepts the possibility that this lack of trust could be attributed to "the long litany of political tragedies and scandals since the 1960s",[1] but believes that this explanation is limited when viewing it alongside other "trends in civic engagement of a wider sort".[1]
Putnam notes the aggregate loss in membership and number of volunteers in many existing civic organizations such as religious groups, labor unions, Parent-Teacher Association, Federation of Women's Clubs, League of Women Voters, volunteers with Boy Scouts and the Red Cross, and fraternity organizations (Lions Clubs, Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks, United States Junior Chamber, Freemasonry, etc.).[2] To illustrate why the decline in Americans' membership in social organizations is problematic to democracy, Putnam uses bowling as an example. Although the number of people who bowl has increased in the last 20 years, the number of people who bowl in leagues has decreased. If people bowl alone, they do not participate in social interaction and civic discussions that might occur in a league environment.[3]
Putnam then contrasts the countertrends of ever increasing mass-membership organizations, nonprofit organizations and support groups to the data of the General Social Survey. This data shows an aggregate decline in membership of traditional civic organizations, supporting his thesis that U.S. social capital has declined. He then asks the obvious question "Why is US social capital eroding?".[4] He believes the "movement of women into the workforce",[5] the "re-potting hypothesis"[6][7] and other demographic changes have made little impact on the number of individuals engaging in civic associations. Instead, he looks to the technological "individualizing" of our leisure time via television, Internet and eventually "virtual reality helmets".[8]
Putnam suggests closer studies of which forms of associations can create the greatest social capital, how various aspects of technology, changes in social equality, and public policy affect social capital.[9] He closes by emphasizing the importance of discovering how the United States could reverse the trend of social capital decay.[10]
Criticism
Everett Carll Ladd claimed that Putnam completely ignored existing field studies, most notably the landmark sociological Middletown studies, which during the 1920s raised the same concerns he does today, except the technology being attacked as promoting isolation was radio, instead of television and video games.[11]
Likewise, Putnam expresses worries that involvement with "community groups" is in decline.[citation needed] However, in the Middletown studies, researchers noted that traditional neighborly ties were in decline although membership in such community groups was rising, which may suggest that new forms of social ties emerge which are not immediately visible to the observer.[citation needed]
Research by Andersen, Curtis and Grabb,[12] which explored time-use diaries over a 40-year period in the U.S., Canada, the Netherlands, and the UK, suggests that only in the U.S. has there been a decline in civic participation.
Other critics have also directly attacked the veracity of Putnam's major finding—that civic participation has in fact been declining. Journalist Nicholas Lemann proposed that rather than declining, civic activity in the US during the 1990s assumed different forms. Instead of bowling leagues, parents integrated themselves into social networks and contribute to the social capital e.g. via youth soccer leagues.[13]
Publication data
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
See also
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Cite error: Invalid <references>
tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.
<references />
, or <references group="..." />
External links
- Official website
- Booknotes interview with Putnam on Bowling Alone, December 24, 2000.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. (Review)
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found., paragraph 13
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found., paragraphs 14-21
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found., paragraph 22
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found., paragraph 35
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found., paragraph 36
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found., paragraph 37
- ↑ An increasing mobility of the Americans evoked that effects just like a frequent re-potting damages plants' roots. The Hour, Jan. 5th 1995, p. 6
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found., paragraph 39
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found., paragraphs 40-44
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found., paragraph 45
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Nicholas Lehmann, The Atlantic Online, April 1996, Kicking in Groups