Captive insurance

Captive insurance companies are insurance companies established by a parent group or groups with the specific objective of covering the risks to which the parent is exposed. Hence, the use of such companies constitutes a type of self-insurance, Captive insurance companies sometimes insure the risks of the group's customers. This is an alternative form of risk management that is becoming a more practical and popular means through which companies can protect themselves financially while having more control over how they are insured.

Origin of term

The term "captive" was coined by the "father of captive insurance," Frederic M. Reiss, while he was bringing his concept into practice for his first client, the Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company, in Ohio in the 1950s. The company had a series of mining operations, and its management referred to the mines whose output was put solely to the corporation's use as captive mines. When Reiss helped the company incorporate its own insurance subsidiaries, they were called captive insurance companies because they wrote insurance exclusively for the captive mines. Reiss continued to use the term: the policyholder owns the insurance company i.e. the insurer is captive to the policyholder. If the captive insures its own parent and affiliates, it is called a pure captive. If it insures just one type of industry (e.g. energy industries), it is called a homogeneous captive. A captive insurance company can also insure a group of diverse companies; this is called a heterogeneous captive.

Domicile

Captives are licensed by many jurisdictions. The captive's primary jurisdiction is known as its domicile. Most captive insurers are based "offshore", in places such as Gibraltar, Mauritius, Belize, Bermuda, The Cayman Islands, Ireland, Guernsey, Luxembourg, Barbados, Malta, The Bahamas, Singapore, Anguilla, the British Virgin Islands, Qatar Financial Centre, Dubai International Financial Centre and Jersey in the Channel Islands.

Bermuda is the world's leading offshore captive domicile. The onshore regulatory burden and the cost of operating either a U.S.-based or Lloyd's-based captive in the early 1960s drove Reiss to seek out a jurisdiction that would allow his captive concept to flourish. After much investigation, he chose Bermuda, due to its geographical location, clean reputation and status as a British Dependent Territory, which avoided the risks and uncertainties often experienced by international businesses operating in politically unstable and unaccountable jurisdictions. Bermuda's captives are predominantly owned by large U.S. corporations. The Cayman Islands is the second largest licensing jurisdiction in terms of the number of captives licensed. Vermont, in the United States, is second in terms of insurance company assets but third in terms of captives licensed. Healthcare corporations prefer Bermuda, due to the ease of claim payment provided by the regulatory environment.

Luxembourg is the largest captive reinsurance domicile in the EU.

A recent trend has various states in the United States revising their regulations to be more attractive to captive insurance companies. For example, Oregon has removed premium taxes from captives, instead charging a $5,000 annual fee. In the United States, Vermont is home to more captive insurers than any other U.S. state, with nearly 900 licensed captive companies as of August 2009.. In recent years, Anguilla has been the fastest growing offshore domicile in numbers of captives, while Montana, Delaware, Tennessee, and Utah have been the fastest growing US domiciles. In 2013, Texas began allowing captives.

Business lines

Captives can cover lines of business, such as workers' compensation, that have relatively predictable claim rates. They can access the reinsurance market to lay off (transfer) risks that they do not wish to accept: this may include product liability, general and professional liability and directors' and officers' liability. Vehicle insurance, both property damage and third party liability of corporate fleets and vehicles, is also quite commonly covered.

Regulation

Captives may be licensed to write some lines of business directly. In other cases, such as workers' compensation in the U.S., for example, the business must initially be written by another insurer, under its insurance licence, which then reinsures it (lays it off) to the captive. The original insurer retains a fee, usually somewhere between 5% and 15%, to provide this service. Premiums paid to captives are tax deductible, provided the terms of the policy (including the premium amount) are reasonable. A captive cannot arbitrarily set the premium amount simply to generate a deduction for the parent. In most situations, the captive carrier should be able to demonstrate its premium generating process (underwriting).

In the European Union, a new set of regulatory requirements (Solvency II) is planned with additional restrictions and responsibilities for captives and reinsurance companies. Some European captives ask for simplified regulation.

Captive Manager

Reiss created the first captive management company, International Risk Management Limited (IRML), in Bermuda in 1962 to provide the administration of his client's captives (this is now part of the Aon Corporation). Most captive management is usually outsourced to a captive manager located in the jurisdiction that holds the primary license for the captive.

In the U.S., most captive managers are small administrative services providers. They don’t draft insurance policies, which is generally the function of a senior insurance or corporate lawyer; they don’t price policies, which is done by a property and casualty insurance underwriter; and they don’t purport to be responsible for state or federal tax issues, which is what a tax lawyer does. Other captive management firms provide a full turnkey service to include all aspects of forming and managing a captive insurer on an ongoing basis, which would include professionals that understand the insurance, tax, and legal aspects of a captive. The middle market is the area of growth for captive managers because more than 90% of Fortune 500 companies already do captives, according to Capstone Associated Services Ltd., a comprehensive manager of small captive insurers with over 140 captives formed for the middle market in the last 15+ years.

Captive insurance companies are creatures of the Internal Revenue Code. Over 75% of the world’s captives are associated with the United States because these insurance arrangements are encouraged under the Internal Revenue Code. Because captives are sophisticated tax structures (having been the subject of dozens of cases and rulings by the IRS, the Tax Court and various appellate courts over the past 70 years) captive owners often engage tax professionals in addition to captive managers that simply provide administrative services.

Micro Captives

Over 90 percent of Fortune 1000 companies and many successful middle market businesses have captives. Over half of all property and casualty premiums that are written, are written through captives.

The Section 831(b) or “small” P&C captive, also known as a "micro captive" is used by midsize companies looking for cost-effective ways to transfer risk. Captive experts say an 831(b) introduces middle market companies to alternative risk transfer and its benefits, providing this class of insurance buyers a valuable cost-saving tool long utilized by Fortune 1000 companies. The Section 831(b) captive or “small” property and casualty captive is one of the most popular choices for middle market companies

Sheltering income from taxes

Captive insurance policies can be "designed so that the risks they insure are so unlikely that the captives will never pay out a claim and all those premiums will go back to the business owners or their heirs with little or no tax."

Main captive domiciles

Domicile	Captive Number	Percentage
Bermuda*	958	19.3%
Cayman Islands*	765	15.4%
Vermont*	567	11.4%
Guernsey*	368	7.4%
Luxembourg*	262	5.3%
Barbados*	256	5.2%
Delaware*	251	5.1%
Ireland*	224	4.5%
British Virgin Islands*	195	3.2%
Hawaii*	163	3.3%
South Carolina*	158	3.2%
Isle of Man	130	2.6%
Nevada*	115	2.3%
Arizona*	108	2.2%
Utah	100	2.0%
Turks & Caicos	71	1.4%
Singapore	57	1.1%
Sweden	41	0.8%
Switzerland	41	0.8%
District of Columbia	40	0.8%
Labuan#	32	0.6%
New York	27	0.5%
Netherlands	26	0.5%
Vanuatu	25	0.5%
Bahamas	23	0.5%
Total	5,003	100.0%

Not listed above by Business Insurance News is Montana with 150 captives as of December 2013 and Anguilla which has more than 300 captives as of December 2012. Delaware does not report.

*2008 Updated stats. Source: Business Insurance News Captives 2008
**2008 Updated stats. Source: http://www.captive.utah.gov/hotnews.html
#2007 Updated stats. Source: LOFSA 2007 Annual Report

See also

• Reinsurance
• Catastrophe bond
• Reinsurance sidecar

Further reading

• Sierk, R. Wesley, Taken Captive: How to Capture Your Piece of America's Multi-Billion Dollar Insurance Industry RMA PRESS, 2008 www.takencaptive.com. ISBN 978-0-9801925-0-6
• Adkisson, Jay D., Adkisson's Captive Insurance Companies: An Introduction to Captives, Closely Held Insurance Companies, and Risk Retention Groups. iUniverse, Inc., 2006. ISBN 0-595-42237-3; ISBN 978-0-595-42237-1.
• Duffy, Catherine R. Held Captive. A History of International Insurance in Bermuda. Toronto, ON. Oakwell Boulton, 2004. ISBN 0-920831-99-0
• Captive Review provides a global trade publication, website, training seminars, conferences and data products
• Captive Review Magazine, January 2013, "The 'Captive Manager' Falacy," p. 50-51.
• P. Wöhrmann/J-P. Krause: "Are you engineering your risks effectively", in: Captive Review Magazine, March 2014, p. 46 f.
• P. Wöhrmann/A. Ruof: "What to look for in an insurer’s captive proposition", in: Captive Review Magazine, October 2013, p. 44 f.
• P. Wöhrmann/P. Marini: Captives come of age, in: Captive Review Solvency 2 Report, October 2014, page 6 f.
• P. Wöhrmann: "Client centricity shapes better service", in: "Captive Review Magazine, June 2012, p. 47
• P. Wöhrmann/X. Groffils: Companies intending to follow a holistic approach have to count on experienced and highly professional fronting insurance companies, in: L'AGEFI, Lux, edition November 2014
• P. Wöhrmann/M. Christen: ALM: Harnessing untapped value, in: Solvency II Report, Captive Review Magazine, p. 10 - 11, August 2015
• P. Wöhrmann/M. Christen: ALM/Harnessing untapped value, in: Solvcency 2 Report 2015, Captive Review, edition July, P. 10-11
• P. Wöhrmann/T. Cunningham: Efficiency and Profitability, in: Captive Review - Global Programme Report, edition October 2015, P. 14-15
• P. Wöhrmann/X. Groffils: How do captive owners benefit from the recent wave of M&A transactions within in the insurance and reinsurance sector ? in: L'AGEFI, Luxembourg edition, Nov. 2015, page 27