Red (programming language)

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Red
Red Logo (stylized Tower of Hanoi)
Paradigm imperative, functional, symbolic
Designed by Nenad Rakocevic
Developer Nenad Rakocevic
First appeared 2011
Stable release 0.6.0 (Alpha) / March, 2016
OS Linux, Windows, OS X, Syllable
License modified BSD license
Filename extensions .red, .reds
Website <strong%20class= "error"><span%20class="scribunto-error"%20id="mw-scribunto-error-1">Lua%20error%20in%20Module:Wd%20at%20line%20405:%20invalid%20escape%20sequence%20near%20'"^'. http://<strong%20class="error"><span%20class="scribunto-error"%20id="mw-scribunto-error-1">Lua%20error%20in%20Module:Wd%20at%20line%20405:%20invalid%20escape%20sequence%20near%20'"^'.Lua error in Module:EditAtWikidata at line 29: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
Influenced by
Rebol, Scala, Lua

Red is a computer programming language. Red were made to overcoming limitations of the computer language Rebol. Red is both an imperative and functional programming language introduced in 2011 by Nenad Rakocevic. Its syntax and general usage directly overlaps with that of the interpreted Rebol language (which was introduced in 1997). The implementation choices of Red were geared specifically to create what Rakocevic calls a "full stack programming language". Red can be used for extremely high-level programming (DSLs and GUIs) as well as low-level programming (operating systems and device drivers).

Key to the approach is that the language has two parts: Red/System and Red. The former (Red/System) is similar to C, but packaged into a Rebol lexical structure (e.g. one would write "if x > y [print {Hello}]" instead of "if (x > y) {printf("Hello\n");}". Red itself is a homoiconic language capable of meta-programming, whose semantics are more similar to Rebol's. Its runtime library is written in Red/System, and uses a hybrid approach: it compiles what it can deduce statically, has a just-in-time compiler for cases that can make use of it, and falls back onto an embedded interpreter when neither of those approaches will suffice.

Red seeks to remain independent of any other toolchain, and thus does its own code generation. It is therefore possible to cross-compile Red programs from any platform it supports to any other, via a command-line switch. Both Red and Red/System are distributed as open-source software under the modified BSD license. The runtime library is distributed under the more permissive Boost Software License.

Red Language architecture schema

Introduction

The Red programming language was presented during the Software Freedom Day 2011[1];[2] giving to its author a large audience; the video is still on the SFD homepage since September 2011. Rakocevic is also the joint winners of the Rebol of the Year 2011 election.[3] Red was first introduced in the Netherlands on February 2011 at the Rebol & Boron conference[4] by its author, who is also known to be the creator of the Cheyenne HTTP server.[5]

Features

Red's syntax and semantics is very close to those of Rebol. Like Rebol, it strongly supports metaprogramming (DSL) and is therefore a highly efficient tool for dialecting. Red/System, which provides system programming facilities also supports some concurrent programming features like task and data parallelism. Red is easy to embed ("Think Lua") and very lightweight (not more than a megabyte). It is also able to cross-compile to various platforms (see Cross Compilation section below) as well as creating packages (like .APK packages on Android) for some platforms (currently, Android is the only platform supported but development is still in process) via bridges intended for implementation of Red on the former (like Java (JVM), .NET, JavaScript etc.).

Goals

The following is the list of Red's Goals as presented on the Software Freedom Day 2011:

  • Simplicity ("An IDE should not be necessary to write code.")
  • Compactness ("Being highly expressive maximizes productivity.")
  • Speed ("If too slow, it cannot be general-purpose enough.")
  • Be "Green", Have a Small Footprint ("Because resources are not limitless.")
  • Ubiquity ("Spread everywhere.")
  • Portability, Write once run everywhere ("That’s the least expected from a programming language.")
  • Flexibility ("Not best but good fit for any task!")

Development

Red's development is planned to be done in two phases:

  1. Initial phase : Red and Red/System compilers written in Rebol
  2. Bootstrap phase : Red/System compiler, Red compiler, Red JIT-compiler rewritten in Red.

Cross compilation

Red currently supports the following cross-compilation targets:

(Note: This list will increase with time and should therefore be considered as incomplete.)

Hello World!

Red [
	Title: "Simple hello world script"
]
print "Hello World!"

Factorial Example

The following is a factorial example in Red :

Red [Title: "A factorial script"]        ; Note: The title is optional.

factorial: func [
	x [integer!]                         ; Giving the type of an argument in Red is optional
][
	either x = 0 [1][x * factorial x - 1]
]

The following is the same factorial example in Red/System (in this very simple case, the source code is very similar to Red's version) :

Red/System [Title: "A factorial script"]

factorial: func [
	x       [integer!]                   ; This is compulsory in Red/System
	return: [integer!]                   ; This is compulsory in Red/System
][
	either x = 0 [1][x * factorial x - 1]
]

See also

References

  1. ↑ « Red », softwarefreedomday.eu, september 14, 2011.
  2. ↑ « Red Programming Language: Red at Software Freedom Day 2011 », red-lang.org, september 14, 2011.
  3. ↑ « Red & Rebol DevCon Winter 2012 », devcon, winter 2012.
  4. ↑ « New Red Programming Language Gets Syllable Backend », osnews.com, May 2011.
  5. ↑ « Red Alert! », syllable.org, May 2011.

External links

Retrieved from "https://infogalactic.com/w/index.php?title=Red_(programming_language)&oldid=719647418"