Plainridge Park Casino

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Plainridge Park Casino
File:Plainridge Racecourse logo.png
Location Plainville, Massachusetts
Owned by Penn National Gaming
Date opened March 17, 1999
Race type Harness racing
Course type Flat
Live racing handle $1.5 million (2011)[1]
Official website

Plainridge Park Casino is a harness racing track and slot machine parlor in Plainville, Massachusetts, owned and operated by Penn National Gaming.

History

Background and license (1990s)

In 1997, Massachusetts's only harness racing track,[2] Foxboro Park, was closed after a legal dispute between its owner, Robert Kraft, and its operator, Charles Sarkis.[3] Two competing plans to resurrect the sport were soon brought before the Massachusetts Racing Commission, with Kraft seeking to reopen Foxboro under a new operator, while Gary Piontkowski, who had managed Foxboro under Sarkis, proposed to build a new track at a 90-acre site in Plainville.[4] Kraft withdrew his application weeks later,[5] however, leaving Piontkowski as harness racing's only hope in the state.

The Racing Commission issued a conditional license for Piontkowski's proposed track in November 1997, with a targeted opening date of May 1998.[6] Piontkowski would purchase the land for $4.5 million, and buy an existing 40,000-square-foot building to use as the grandstand.[7] The project would be financed by an $11 million loan from Cornerstone Capital.[7]

Piontkowski's application ran into trouble when the Commission found that Cornerstone had never actually committed to the loan, and that Piontkowski might have used a loan broker who had since been imprisoned for bank fraud.[8] The project was nevertheless granted a two-month extension of its financing deadline, raising criticism that commissioners were being too lenient with Piontkowski, who had previously served as the Racing Commission's chairman.[9] By April 1998, the commission approved a new financing plan, with ownership of the track to be shared by nine investors, with Piontkowski holding a 15% share.[10]

In May 1998, a neighboring landowner filed a lawsuit seeking to nullify the track's building permit,[11] prompting Piontkowski to suspend construction and push back the track's debut to the next season.[12] The lawsuit was later settled out of court.[13]

A new application was filed in October 1998,[14] under which the purchase of the land and construction of the track would be financed by real estate developer Lou Giuliano, who would lease the track to Piontkowski's company for $1 million per year.[15] The Racing Commission approved the license in November.[16]

Opening (1999)

The track opened for simulcast wagering on March 17, 1999,[17] and held its first day of live racing a month later on April 19.[18]

Plainridge faced criticism from the beginning, with industry observers and Racing Commission chair Robert Hutchinson arguing that the track's live racing schedule was nothing but an excuse to justify a lucrative off-track betting operation and a potential racino; a large room in the grandstand was set aside for the installation of as many as 400 slot machines.[19]

Around July 1999, a rift grew between Piontkowski and Giuliano over management of the track.[20] Giuliano then applied for a license to operate the track himself in 2000, claiming that Piontkowski's lease was valid only until December 31, 1999.[20] The commission found that Giuliano did not actually own the land, but only held an option to buy it from a Boston investment company, Realty Financial Partners (RFP), which had financed the purchase.[21] Piontkowski's company was approved to retain the license, subject to the condition that it obtain financing the buy the track from RFP.[21] After Giuliano failed to exercise his option to buy the track, RFP claimed control and served an eviction notice on Piontkowski.[22] A deal was soon reached for Piontkowski's group to buy Plainridge from RFP for $13.6 million, to be partially financed by Anchor Gaming.[23] The sale was completed in May 2000.[24]

In the wake of their dispute, Piontkowski and Giuliano filed dozens of lawsuits against of each other, with proceedings lasting through 2005.[25] Giuliano initiated multiple attempts to develop a nearby competing harness racing track,[26][27] none of them successful.

Addition of slot machines

Piontkowski consistently supported proposed legislation to authorize slot machines at the state's four racetracks, touting plans for a $180-million expansion of Plainridge.[28] Discussions were held with major gaming companies about developing a casino at the track,[29] but the site was seen as having limited potential due to its proximity to the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, who were likely to develop a casino under any expanded gambling regimen.[30] In 2008, Piontkowski was credited with killing a casino bill pushed by Governor Deval Patrick because it had no provision for racinos.[30]

In 2011, the state finally enacted casino legislation, authorizing up to three resort-style casinos and one slots-only facility.[31] The slot parlor provision originated as a compromise between House Speaker Robert DeLeo, a staunch advocate of racinos, and Governor Patrick, who opposed allowing slot machines at racetracks without a competitive bidding process.[32] Plainridge was the state's first gaming applicant, submitting its $400,000 application fee as soon as the process opened.[33] Piontkowski stated that the track could not continue live racing without the additional revenue of slot machines;[34] one of the track's owners said the site could otherwise be redeveloped as a shopping center.[35]

The track began construction of a 1,000-car parking garage in late 2012, hoping to demonstrate to the Gaming Commission that its proposal would be the quickest to open and begin generating tax revenue.[36]

In early 2013, state investigators found that Piontkowski had taken over $1 million in cash from the track's money room over the years; the distributions were recorded on the company books, but had not been approved by the track's majority owners.[37] As a result, the owners pushed Piontkowski out as president, and bought out his shares.[38] The track's new president vowed to change the organization's "culture",[38] but the Gaming Commission called the changes "way too little, way too late", and disqualified Plainridge's application for a gaming license in August 2013.[39]

New hope for the track emerged weeks later, when Penn National Gaming, fresh off a failure to win approval for its proposed slot parlor in Tewksbury, reached a deal to pursue a gaming license at Plainridge, with an option to buy the track if its bid were successful.[40] Plainville voters soon approved the slots plan by a margin of 3 to 1 in a town referendum, required as a condition of licensing.[41]

Penn National was awarded the gaming license in February 2014. The bid overcame competition from two other applicants, a Cordish Company slot parlor proposed for Leominster, and a former greyhound racing track in Raynham.[41]

The slot parlor held a soft opening for invited guests on June 22, 2015,[42] and opened to the public on June 24.[43]

See also

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via NewsBank (subscription required)
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via NewsBank (subscription required)
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via NewsBank (subscription required)
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via NewsBank (subscription required)
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via NewsBank (subscription required)
  7. 7.0 7.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via NewsBank (subscription required)
  18. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via NewsBank (subscription required)
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  20. 20.0 20.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  21. 21.0 21.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  22. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  28. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.  – via Factiva (subscription required)
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. 30.0 30.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. 38.0 38.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. 41.0 41.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.