Enfield Falls Canal

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Enfield Falls)
Jump to: navigation, search
Enfield Falls Canal
PostcardWindsorLocksCanalRRBridge1909.jpg
Windsor Locks Canal and railroad bridge (postcard mailed in 1909)
Specifications
Length 5.25 miles (8.45 km)
Locks 1 (north end); 3 (south end)
Status Closed
Navigation authority
Enfield Falls Canal (Windsor Locks Canal)
Nearest city Windsor Locks, Connecticut
Area 55 acres (22 ha)
Built 1829
NRHP Reference # 76001998[1]
Added to NRHP April 22, 1976
History
Construction began 1827
Date completed November 11, 1829
Geography
Start point Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
End point Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Enfield Falls Canal (Windsor Locks Canal) is a canal that was built to circumvent the shallows at Enfield Falls (or Enfield Rapids) on the Connecticut River, en route either to or from Springfield, Massachusetts. It is situated along the west side of the river, adjacent to the towns of Suffield and Windsor Locks of Hartford County in the state of Connecticut, USA. Windsor Locks is named after the series of locks on the canal.

Prior to the opening of the canal, the scows or flat-bottomed boats which plied the Connecticut River could only ascend the falls by engaging local fallsmen to propel the craft forward utilizing set poles. One fallsman was required for each ton of cargo. Not only did the added labor costs make this method of overtaking the falls expensive, but the amount of cargo that could be transported was limited to approximately ten tons. Any additional freight had to be offloaded at Warehouse Point on the east bank and warehoused for later transport or carried around the falls by ox teams.

Construction

File:Enfield Falls Canal by Elias Friedman.JPG
Windsor Locks Canal Company buildings alongside the canal. Amtrak's New Haven-Springfield Line is visible in the foreground.

Construction of the canal commenced in 1827 and it was opened on November 11, 1829. The canal was Lua error in Module:Convert at line 452: attempt to index field 'titles' (a nil value). long and had a vertical drop of 32 ft (9.8 m). The locks admitted craft up to 90 ft (27 m) long and 20 ft (6.1 m) wide. The canal was unique among canals of the era in that it was designed with structural reinforcement to facilitate steam tug boat traffic. The design of the canal included a massive head gate with apertures that could be opened and closed to precisely control water levels not only within the lock chambers but within the canal itself. The design feature supported the incorporator's dual intent to profit not only from tolls charged on canal traffic but from the sale of mill sites and the leasing of water rights to mill operators along the last mile of the canal bank.

Once the canal was opened, boats were able to carry much larger loads, and the anticipated steamboat services were introduced using newly designed vessels capable of passing through the lock chambers. By 1844 the Hartford and Springfield Railroad had started operation, and navigation on the Connecticut River gradually reduced. The profits realized from the sale of water rights proved to be the more lucrative of the canal's two purposes.

Today

Today the canal is closed to navigation and privately owned by the Ahlstrom Corporation,[2] which has a manufacturing facility adjacent to the canal.[3] The locks themselves still exist, but have not been usable since the 1970s.[4] Most of the towpath is open for hiking and cycling. The canal is listed in the National Register of Historic Places. According to a sign at on the Windsor Locks, CT gate near CT Route 190, the trail is open from dawn to dusk from April 1 until November 1.

See also

References

Script error: No such module "Attached KML".

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. American Canal Society (2004). Enfield Falls Canal. Retrieved 17 August 2011 from Internet Archive.
  3. Ahstrom Corporation, Official Website. "Contact Us". Accessed March 11, 2012.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.