Talk:Wikipedia

Agreed to the Fenris excisions, both counts, for reasons stated. Rectified (talk) 11:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

IG mass deletions

Strongly disagree with the most recent removal of my work and by others, on which we spent a lot of time. Seems a too-large part of IG efforts involve removing the work of other contributors.

What to do

I will attempt to restore the deleted text to a newly created fork of the Wikipedia article, that I will start soon. IG was created to allow different versions of the same article to exist. This will allow different viewpoints or editorial biases to be fully expressed. I've done that before and it works relatively well. My own preferred editorial policy with existing articles will continue to be to only add or correct text, not to remove it, except in the most egregious circumstances. Jack-arcalon (talk) 19:55, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Red writing

What is all this red script on the page? Are there some errors? Petronella (talk)

Luau errors?

This is an attempt to recreate the errors when code from WP is imported to IG:

START TEST:

The six largest language editions are (in order of article count):

[[ Wikipedia|]], [[ Wikipedia|]], [[ Wikipedia|]], [[ Wikipedia|]], [[ Wikipedia|]], and [[ Wikipedia|]]

END TEST

Oh I see. Well if that is helpful to others then we had better let it stand. Petronella (talk)

You know Wikipedia is biased when...

• 1: you have Chip Berlet as a propagandist on there.
• 2: you have extremist LGBT activists manipulating articles and smearing their opponents as "homophobic" or "transphobic" bigots.
• 3: you have Islamist terrorists manipulating articles and smearing critics of Islamism as "Islamophobic racists".
• 4: you have Antifa/BLM activists manipulating articles and smearing critics as "far-right extremists", "white supremacists" and racist bigots.
• 5: you have fourth-wave feminists manipulating articles and smearing their critics as "misogynistic sexist bigots.
• 6: you have leading editors on there who are openly sympathetic towards communism and outright despise white people with a burning passion, as well as non-whites who oppose the anti-white agenda (ie, Jesse Lee Peterson).
• 7: many of its registered users who haven't been banned from the site, including some Arbitration Committee members, are also active on RationalWiki and vice versa (ie, David Gerard, Doug Weller, etc).
• 8: The Wikimedia Foundation is pro-population replacement, and its executive director is a rabidly anti-white radical feminist.
• 9: Larry Sanger has called it out for what it is.
• 10: The site is run by NWO globalists.
• 11: The site propagates race denialism; in other words, anyone who believes in differences between the races are racists and believers in pseudoscience, at least according to Wikipedians.
• 12: Right Wing Watch is used as a source on figures who Wikipedians outright despise (ie, any "white supremacist" or "far-right conspiracy theorist") to back up their supposed claims.